Replicable types and subtypes of personality: German NEO‐PI‐R versus NEO‐FFI

By Konrad Schnabel, Jens B. Asendorpf, F. Ostendorf. 2002

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eeffb4138d44ed082f27b5d490201ad6ee6d5485

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Jaap J. A. Denissen
2. Nazar Akrami
3. B. Ekehammar
4. Włodzimierz Strus
5. Jan Cieciuch
6. T. Rowiński
7. M. Roth
8. Jens B. Asendorpf

In Clinical Psychology

1. Jens B. Asendorpf
2. Jaap J. A. Denissen
3. Nazar Akrami
4. B. Ekehammar
5. M. V. van Aken
6. C. V. van Lieshout
7. P. Herzberg
8. M. Roth

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Jens B. Asendorpf
2. Jaap J. A. Denissen
3. Nazar Akrami
4. B. Ekehammar
5. P. Herzberg
6. M. Roth
7. M. V. van Aken
8. P. Borkenau

Citations in the corpus

• Predictive Validity of Personality Types Versus Personality Dimensions From Early Childhood to Adulthood: Implications for the Distinction Between Core and Surface Traits (2006, methodology): “These types (referred to as RUO types throughout this article) were confirmed through replicated Q-factor or cluster analysis for both children and adults (e.g., Asendorpf & van Aken, 1999; Asendorpf et al., 2001; Barbaranelli, 2002; Boehm, Asendorpf, & Avia, 2002; Costa, Herbst, McCrae, Samuels, & ”
• Beyond resilients, undercontrollers, and overcontrollers? an extension of personality prototype research (2006, background): “The assertive prototype of Schnabel et al. (2002) is a subtype of the resilient prototype.”
• The Circumplex of Personality Metatraits: A Synthesizing Model of Personality Based on the Big Five (2014, methodology): “The three personality types replicated in the literature and based on the configurations of the five factors (Alessandri et al., 2014; Barbaranelli, 2002; Schnabel et al., 2002; Zawadzki & Strelau, 2003a) may be accommodated within the proposed model.”
• The relation between personality and prejudice: a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach (2003, methodology): “The modern scale was developed by Akrami, Ekehammar, Sonnander, and Claesson (manuscript submitted for publication) to measure attitudes and prejudice toward mentally disabled persons, taking into account the distinction between classical (blatant, ‘oldfashioned’) and modern prejudice, based on Sear”
• Adolescent Personality Types and Subtypes and Their Psychosocial Adjustment (2005, methodology): “…correlates focused on children (e.g., Asendorpf & van Aken, 1999; Hart et al., 1997; van Lieshout et al., 1995) or adults (e.g., Asendorpf et al., 2001; Boehm, Asendorpf, & Avia, 2002; Schnabel et al., 2002), while very few focused on adolescents (Dubas et al., 2002; van Aken et al., 2002).”
• Resilients, Overcontrollers, and Undercontrollers: The replicability of the three personality prototypes across informants (2004, methodology): “Second, several studies were recently carried out on personality types among young adults (18–30 years) (Asendorpf et al., 2001; Barbaranelli, 2002; Boehm et al., 2002; Schnabel et al., 2002).”