Common method variance or measurement bias? The problem and possible solutions
By Paul E. Spector, Michael T. Brannick. 2009
109 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f541a98b2425008ffb36f33e5cce0df86f1d06b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Ashlea Troth
- Peter J. Jordan
- P. Oliveira
- Enno Siemsen
- Aleda V. Roth
- K. De Roeck
- P. M. Bal
- Anders Dysvik
Citations in the corpus
- Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies (2015, unknown): “…that needs to be controlled (e.g., Campbell & Fiske 1959; Cote & Buckley 1987, 1988; Doty & Organ 1986; Sharma et al. 2009; Williams Anderson 1994; Williams et al. 1989, 2010), some claim that it is a myth or urban leg-end (e.g., Chen & Spector 1991; Spector 1987 2006; Spector & Brannick 2009).”
- Common Method Bias in Regression Models With Linear, Quadratic, and Interaction Effects (2010, methodology): “See, for example, Spector and Brannick (2009) or Podsakoff et al. (2003).”
- Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations (2020, background): “There are also substantial reviews of this phenomenon particularly within the psychological sciences (Antonakis, 2017; Doty and Glick, 1998; Fuller et al., 2016; Podsakoff et al., 2012; Spector, 2006; Spector and Brannick, 2009).”
- Common Method Bias in Public Management Studies (2015, unknown): “For narrower definitions and further discussions on the concept of method, see Spector and Brannick (2009).”