Carl Johan Lagerkvist

Economics and Econometrics · 2005–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 21 researchers and is trusted by 19 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Economics and Econometrics — 66 citations into it; #4,380 of 23,481 by trust here, #4,275 by citations
• General Decision Sciences — 28 citations into it; #734 of 1,995 by trust here, #953 by citations
• Plant Science — 22 citations into it; #1,868 of 8,232 by trust here, #3,498 by citations
• Marketing — 18 citations into it; #4,068 of 6,289 by trust here, #3,283 by citations
• Food Science — 12 citations into it
• Safety Research — 9 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 6 citations into it
• Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law — 5 citations into it; #737 of 2,821 by trust here, #1,127 by citations

Whom Carl Johan Lagerkvist trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. S. Jaeger
2. Fredrik Carlsson
3. Jayson L. Lusk
4. Jian Bi
5. David A. Hensher
6. Kenneth Train
7. Wim Verbeke
8. P. Frykblom
9. Julius Juma Okello
10. Jordan J. Louviere

Who trusts Carl Johan Lagerkvist overall

1. Jayson L. Lusk
2. Fredrik Carlsson
3. G. Tonsor
4. F. Norwood
5. Carolina Liljenstolpe
6. N. Olynk
7. J. Ladenburg
8. A. Gracia
9. E. V. Loo
10. M. Costanigro

Papers from Carl Johan Lagerkvist's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Carl Johan Lagerkvist trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?
2. Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions
3. Households’ Willingness to Pay for Water Service Attributes
4. Best–worst scaling: An introduction and initial comparison with monadic rating for preference elicitation with food products
5. Assessing the impacts of alternative 'Opt-out' formats in choice experiment studies: Consumer preferences for genetically modified content and production information in food
6. 计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis
7. Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks
8. Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments
9. The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching
10. Willingness‐to‐Pay Estimates and Their Relevance to Agribusiness Decision Making

Their papers

• Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments (2005) — 355 citations
• Consumer Benefits of Labels and Bans on GM Foods—Choice Experiments with Swedish Consumers (2007) — 168 citations
• A meta-analysis of consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare (2011) — 359 citations
• Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter (2007) — 233 citations
• Anchored vs. relative best–worst scaling and latent class vs. hierarchical Bayesian analysis of best–worst choice data: Investigating the importance of food quality attributes in a developing country (2012) — 53 citations
• Urban sprawl, food security and agricultural systems in developing countries: A systematic review of the literature (2019) — 239 citations
• A framework to assess the resilience of farming systems (2019) — 657 citations
• Consumer preferences for food labelling attributes: Comparing direct ranking and best–worst scaling for measurement of attribute importance, preference intensity and attribute dominance (2013) — 100 citations
• Swedish Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare and Biotech: A Choice Experiment (2006) — 156 citations