Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks

By Jayson L. Lusk, Ted C. Schroeder. 2004

910 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7405b0aeeb03961e12a149d603c35f2054eb6ca8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Swedish Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare and Biotech: A Choice Experiment (2006, background): “, for a welfare analysis), it is important to make sure that one is not capturing effects on the variance instead; see for example Louviere, Hensher, and Swait (2000), Swait and Adamowicz (2001), and Islam and Louviere (2004).”
How Closely Do Hypothetical Surveys and Laboratory Experiments Predict Field Behavior (2009, methodology): “Alfnes et al. (2006), Ding, Grewal, and Liechty (2005), and Lusk and Schroeder (2004) all have implemented nonhypothetical choice experiments.”
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, result): “For example, we do not discuss in detail the selection and assignment of attribute levels in CEs nor bid levels in CV questions.”
Organic or Local? Investigating Consumer Preference for Fresh Produce Using a Choice Experiment with Real Economic Incentives (2009, background): “Lusk and Schroeder (2004) found that there is no significant difference between marginal WTP elicited from hypothetical and nonhypothetical experiments when real products instead of pictures are used in both experiments.”
Conformity and the Demand for Environmental Goods (2010, background): “2001; Johansson-Stenman and Svedsater 2008; Lusk and Schroeder 2004 ).”
Comparing Willingness to Pay for Organic, Natural, Locally Grown, and State Marketing Program Promoted Foods in the Mid-Atlantic Region (2011, neutral): “Lusk and Schroeder (2004) tested for hypothetical bias utilizing a CE featuring beef ribeye steaks.”
Willingness to pay for environmental attributes of non-food agricultural products: a real choice experiment (2013, background): “For example, in the study conducted by Lusk et al. (2004), all choice sets included the five alternative branded beefsteaks with variable prices and a “no steak” option.”
Consumer Benefits of Labels and Bans on GM Foods—Choice Experiments with Swedish Consumers (2007, neutral): “…equal marginal WTP in a real and a hypothetical setting, while Johansson-Stenman and Svedsäter (2003) did reject the equality of marginal WTPs and Lusk and Schroeder (2004) found that hypothetical choices overestimate total WTP, but did not reject the equality of marginal WTPs for changes in…”