Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter

By Fredrik Carlsson, P. Frykblom, Carl Johan Lagerkvist. 2007

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db0c59e1b50219ac1c78a353972e78dc6b006534

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. N. Olynk
2. C. Wolf
3. G. Tonsor
4. F. Norwood
5. Jayson L. Lusk
6. David L. Ortega

In Marketing

1. N. Olynk
2. C. Wolf
3. G. Tonsor

In Plant Science

1. N. Olynk
2. C. Wolf
3. G. Tonsor
4. Jayson L. Lusk
5. F. Norwood
6. David L. Ortega

Citations in the corpus

• Farm Animal Welfare, Consumer Willingness to Pay, and Trust: Results of a Cross-National Survey (2010, unknown): “…in the European Union (EU), where researchers have explored the financial impact along the livestock production chain (McInerney 2004), consumer attitudes, and willingness to pay (WTP) for measures and policies supporting FAW (Bennett and Blaney 2003; Carlsson, Frykblom, and Lagerkvist 2007).”
• Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates (2009, methodology): “Utility coefficients for the first class (32% of population) indicate a preference for pork Labeled Gestation Crate-Free and dislike of Large, Gestation Crate Ban and Brazil attributes.”