Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?

By T. Cameron, Gregory L. Poe, Robert G. Ethier, William D. Schulze. 2002

288 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b55d6b531c92f1cdc906bdb8d05efc24e714f9e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes (2011, unknown): “Utilizing the same dataset, Li et al. (2004) follow the approach suggested by Cameron et al. (2002) to determine if the underlying preferences from the Internet and telephone samples are the same.”
Consumer Benefits of Labels and Bans on GM Foods—Choice Experiments with Swedish Consumers (2007, unknown): “Both Carlsson and Martinsson (2001) and Cameron et al. (2002) failed to reject a hypothesis of equal marginal WTP in a real and a hypothetical setting, while Johansson-Stenman and Svedsäter (2003) did reject the equality of marginal WTPs and Lusk and Schroeder (2004) found that hypothetical…”
Agroforestry development: An environmental economic perspective (2004, background): “Cameron et al. (2002) estimated nonmarket value of tree plantation on public lands accounting for the benefits of shade, windbreaks, and carbon sequestration.”
Using Respondent Uncertainty to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias in a Stated Choice Experiment (2010, background): “Cameron et al. (2002) found that the proportion of CE respondents who chose to participate in a green energy program was higher in the hypothetical payment treatment than in the actual payment treatment, and that WTP estimates from hypothetical payment responses exceeded those estimated from actual ”
Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimates (2007, unknown): “Other studies have used data pooling to examine whether different elicitation methods reveal the same model of preferences (Adamowicz et al. 1994, 1998; Cameron et al. 2002; Hanley et al. 2003; Layton and Lee 2006).”
Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments (2005, background): “Both Carlsson and Martinsson (2001) and Cameron et al. (2002) fail to reject a hypothesis of equal marginal WTP in both a real and a hypothetical setting, while Johansson-Stenman and Svedsäter (2003) rejects the equality of marginal WTPs and Lusk and Schroeder (2004) find that hypothetical total…”
The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity (2010, background): “However, research on sources of heterogeneity is in its infancy (see, e.g., Louviere et al. 2002, Cameron et al. 2002), 7 so this hypothesis is only preliminary.”
Understanding Hypothetical Bias: An Enhanced Meta‐Analysis (2018, unknown): “Lastly, choice experiments, referendum, and open-ended/payment card approaches all have smaller CFs, they are statistically equivalent, consistent with the findings of Cameron et al. (2002), with a possible exception between referenda and openended/payment cards.”
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “Multiple studies have investigated the convergent validity of estimates from these two formats (e.g., Adamowicz et al. 1998; Hanley et al. 1998; Cameron et al. 2002; Foster and Mourato 2003; Ryan 2004; Jin, Wang, and Ran 2006; Mogas, Riera, and Bennett 2006; Goldberg and Rosen 2007).”
What's it worth? An examination of historical trends and future directions in environmental valuation (2004, background): “(1994) has progressed to the assessment of multiple data sources and the inclusion of preference and variability factors (Cameron et al. 2002).”