Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions

By Gregory L. Poe, Kelly L. Giraud, Jackson Loomis. 2005

638 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19cfee9df9bb448870a3a557d980bff0a074321c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

The first time is the hardest: A test of ordering effects in choice experiments (2012, methodology): “To compare the different WTP estimates across the two sequences, we have applied the Complete Combinatorial test (CC test) suggested by Poe et al. (2005).”
Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households' for micro-generation technologies (2010, background): “more convenient because coefficient estimates are interpretable in the money space, and so are the estimated standard errors that need not be derived using simulation (Poe et al. 2005) or closed form approximations (e.”
Variable Very High Energy γ-Ray Emission from Markarian 501 (2007, methodology): “For a quantitative comparison, we followed the robust method from Poe et al (2005), which is based on the convolution of empirical probability density distributions.”
Modeling preference heterogeneity in stated choice data: an analysis for public goods generated by agriculture (2009, methodology): “by Poe et al. (2005). This test is the most commonly used in the choice experi-”
CONTINGENT VALUATION: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE (2010, methodology): “More recently, convolutions and bootstrap approaches have been applied (Poe et al., 2005).”
Do protest responses to a contingent valuation question and a choice experiment differ? (2008, methodology): “The complete combinatorial method proposed by Poe et al. (2005) results in rejecting the null hypothesis of equivalence of the WTP values from the CE and the CV for the Luneburger Heide region.”
Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods (2009, methodology): “These are obtained from a t-test testing the null hypothesis of equality in means (H0: WTPinternet=WTPmail), as well as from the Complete Combinatorial approach suggested by Poe et al. (1994; 2005).”
Emerging versus developed economy consumer willingness to pay for environmentally sustainable food production: a choice experiment approach comparing Indian, Chinese and United Kingdom lamb consumers (2016, methodology): “To evaluate if observed differences in WTP between countries are statistically significant we employ the Complete Combinatorial testing method (Poe et al., 2005).”
Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates (2009, methodology): “suggested by Poe, Giraud, and Loomis (2005) was used to provide a simple”
The impact of offering two versus three alternatives in choice modelling experiments (2009, positive): “A Poe et al. (2005) test revealed no significant difference between the eight and the twelve choice set models.”
Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments (2005, methodology): “To formally test whether there are differences in marginal WTP, we apply the Complete Combinatorial test suggested by Poe et al. (2005).”