Consumer Benefits of Labels and Bans on GM Foods—Choice Experiments with Swedish Consumers

By Fredrik Carlsson, P. Frykblom, Carl Johan Lagerkvist. 2007

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/891b846e3fc9252c5df510b4402d9f9ad43c65cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. N. Olynk
2. G. Tonsor
3. Jayson L. Lusk
4. F. Norwood
5. C. Wolf
6. Vincenzina Caputo
7. Fredrik Carlsson
8. C. Michaud

In Plant Science

1. Jayson L. Lusk
2. F. Norwood
3. N. Olynk
4. G. Tonsor
5. C. Wolf
6. C. Michaud
7. Daniel Llerena
8. I. Joly

Citations in the corpus

• Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States (2014, background): “…and Bernard, 2010; Huffman, 2010; Hartl and Herrmann, 2009; Volinskiy et al., 2009; Bukenya and Wright, 2007; Moon et al. 2007; Huffman et al., 2007; Carlsson et al., 2007; Tegene et al., 2003; Loureiro and Hine, 2002; Burton et al., 2001; Lusk et al., 2003; Moon and Balasubramanian, 2001).”
• Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates (2009, methodology): “Utility coefficients for the first class (32% of population) indicate a preference for pork Labeled Gestation Crate-Free and dislike of Large, Gestation Crate Ban and Brazil attributes.”
• Animal Welfare Economics (2011, methodology): “Among Swedish consumers, Carlsson et al. (2007b) did not find evidence of a perceived market failure, a result confirmed by Tonsor et al. (2009a) in their study of Michigan consumers. When allowing for consumer heterogeneity, however, Tonsor et al. (2009a) found that approximately 20% of consumers p”
• Willingness to pay for environmental attributes of non-food agricultural products: a real choice experiment (2013, methodology): “It has been shown that the values depend highly on the methods used to elicit them (see for example Lusk et al. 2005, Carlsson et al. 2007, Gracia et al. 2011).”
• Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments (2011, unknown): “(2006), Carlsson et al. (2003),Othman et al.”
• Consumer preferences for farm-raised meat, lab-grown meat, and plant-based meat alternatives: Does information or brand matter? (2020, background): “Previous research has shown complex relationships between preferences for policy alternatives and preferences for shopping behavior (e.g., Brooks and Lusk, 2012; Carlsson et al., 2019; Hamilton et al., 2003; Paul et al., 2019).”
• Conformity and the Demand for Environmental Goods (2010, background): “making consumption decisions ( Carlsson et al., 2007; Teisl et al., 2002; Bjorner et al., 2004),”
• Farmers' preferences for crop variety traits: Lessons for on-farm conservation and technology adoption (2010, background): “First, we are not going to try to measure the purchase of different varieties, instead our focus is on estimating the marginal willingness to pay for the attributes of the variety, and, therefore, it is not necessary to include an opt-out alternative (Carlsson et al., 2007).”