Assessing the impacts of alternative 'Opt-out' formats in choice experiment studies: Consumer preferences for genetically modified content and production information in food

By Andreas Kontoleon, M. Yabe. 2003

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53450ec62f4d8725e79b4ccbee38d9745fd82322

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Benefit Estimates for Landscape Improvements: Sequential Bayesian Design and Respondents’ Rationality in a Choice Experiment (2005, background): “…have found theoretical reasons for status-quo bias (Samuelson and Zeckhauser 1988; Haaijer 1999; Haaijer, Kamakura, and Wedel 2001), and choice experiment applications in environmental economics (see, e.g., Lehtonen et al. 2003; Kontoleon and Yabe 2003) found these effects to be significant.”
Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter (2007, background): “The inclusion or exclusion of an opt-out alternative in a CE has several potential behavioural as well as econometric implications (Kontoleon and Yabe, 2003).”
Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions (2007, background): “3 For a literature review on the inclusion and form of the opt-out alternative in stated preference experiments, see Kontoleon and Yabe (2003). Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions 85”
Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions: The case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods (2008, background): “The sign of the ASC is not consistent, however, with high levels of subjective uncertainty caused by unfamiliarity (test 3a).”
Should Reference Alternatives in Pivot Design SC Surveys be Treated Differently? (2009, background): “Numerous studies in the environmental economics literature have found empirical evidence supporting the above ’status quo’ effects (see for example Lehtonen et al., 2003; Kontoleon and Yabe, 2003; Mogas et al., 2006; Scarpa et al., 2007a), whilst Scarpa et al.”
The first time is the hardest: A test of ordering effects in choice experiments (2012, methodology): “Instead, the ratio of the scale factor of one data set relative to another can be identified by normalizing one of them to unity and then defining a range of values of the other scale factor, within which the log likelihood function is expected to be maximized (Swait and Louviere 1993). The scale ra”
Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments (2008, background): “…for status-quo bias (Samuelson and Zeckhauser, 1988; Haaijer et al., 2001), and discrete choice experiment applications in ecological and environmental economics (see, for example, Lehtonen et al., 2003; Kontoleon and Yabe, 2003; Scarpa et al., 2005) have found these effects to be significant.”
Importance of health and environment as quality traits in the buying decision of organic products (2009, background): “An “opt out”-choice was not incorporated to avoid an “easy way out” for consumers that are facing decision difficulty ( Kontoleon and Yabe, 2003”