Douglas Biber
Literature and Literary Theory · 2001–2020
A researcher in the Science corpus: 17 papers; trusts 21 researchers and is trusted by 37 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Literature and Literary Theory — 91 citations into it; #75 of 2,496 by trust here, #54 by citations
- Language and Linguistics — 74 citations into it; #269 of 3,093 by trust here, #134 by citations
- Developmental and Educational Psychology — 58 citations into it; #594 of 8,223 by trust here, #1,191 by citations
- Artificial Intelligence — 34 citations into it; #16,072 of 35,345 by trust here, #19,873 by citations
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 29 citations into it; #1,468 of 9,731 by trust here, #2,721 by citations
- Education — 20 citations into it; #2,950 of 11,309 by trust here, #4,832 by citations
- Philosophy — 7 citations into it; #309 of 1,040 by trust here, #318 by citations
- Gender Studies — 6 citations into it
Whom Douglas Biber trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Ken Hyland
- Viviana Cortes
- Susan Conrad
- Averil Coxhead
- Tom Lumley
- Alison Wray
- L. Ortega
- M. Charles
- Scott Jarvis
- Annie Brown
Who trusts Douglas Biber overall
- Ken Hyland
- Alison Wray
- Bethany Gray
- Yu-Hua Chen
- Eric Friginal
- Beth Herbel-Eisenmann
- Magali Paquot
- K. Kyle
- Susana M. Sotillo
- Scott Andrew Crossley
Papers from Douglas Biber's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Douglas Biber trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- A New Academic Word List
- Formulaic Language and the Lexicon: List of Figures and Tables
- The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model
- Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL
- Research Genres: Explorations and Applications
- Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing
- Using Computer-Tagged Linguistic Features to Describe L2 Writing Differences
- Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: principle and practice
- The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English
- Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness
Their papers
- Investigating grammatical complexity in L2 English writing research: Linguistic description versus predictive measurement (2020) — 153 citations
- Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing (2019) — 114 citations
- Register, Genre, and Style (2019) — 768 citations
- Register Variation Online (2018) — 148 citations
- Discourse Characteristics of Writing and Speaking Task Types on the "TOEFL iBT"® Test: A Lexico-Grammatical Analysis. "TOEFL iBT"® Research Report. TOEFL iBT-19. Research Report. RR-13-04. (2013) — 100 citations
- Current Conceptions of Stance (2012) — 126 citations
- Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development (2011) — 681 citations
- Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness (2010) — 520 citations
- A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: multi-word patterns in speech and writing (2009) — 445 citations
- Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers (2007) — 669 citations
- Stance in spoken and written university registers (2006) — 524 citations
- University Language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers (2006) — 937 citations
- The Frequency and Use of Lexical Bundles in Conversation and Academic Prose (2005) — 330 citations
- If you look at …: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks (2004) — 1,376 citations
- Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English (2002) — 357 citations
- Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison (2002) — 313 citations
- Corpus-Based Research in TESOL (2001) — 86 citations