If you look at …: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks

By Douglas Biber, Susan Conrad, Viviana Cortes. 2004

1,376 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7181d6300ae0bb87ecd2820b8ba9520e5d7578b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

Investigating Criterial Discourse Features across Second Language Development: Lexical Bundles in Rated Learner Essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1 (2014, background): “These high frequency sequences largely straddle the boundary between lexis and syntax, functioning as ‘basic building blocks of discourse’ (Biber et al. 2004: 371).”
As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation (2008, methodology): “A framework for analysing the bundles found in this corpus was developed from Biber’s (Biber, 2006; Biber et al., 2004) classification.”
An Academic Formulas List: New Methods in Phraseology Research (2010, methodology): “First, as in prior research with lexis (Nation 2001) and lexical bundles (Biber et al. 2004; Biber 2006), we used frequency of occurrence to identify constructions that appear above a baseline threshold frequency and which therefore have a reasonable currency in the language as a whole.”
Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure (2010, background): “…language teachers and researchers in the role played by formulaic sequences in fluent and at TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY on November 30, 2014slr.sagepub.comDownloaded from idiomatic language use (Lewis, 2000; Nattinger and DeCarrico, 1992; Wray, 2002; Biber et al., 2004; Schmitt, 2004; Hoey, 2005).”
A Phrasal Expressions List (2012, background): “…need, there is typically conventionalized language (i.e. formulaic sequences) available to realize this need (Nattinger and DeCarrico 1992: 62–63) in all genres, including scientific and academic discourse (e.g. Biber et al. 2004; Dorgeloh and Wanner 2009; Hyland 2008; Wulff et al. 2009).”