Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers

By Douglas Biber, Federica Barbieri. 2007

669 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bea52ffff06e97bec58cb490312353c920857022

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Paul Baker
2. Yu-Hua Chen
3. Rita Simpson-Vlach
4. Nick C. Ellis
5. Sylviane Granger
6. Beth Herbel-Eisenmann
7. D. Wagner
8. Magali Paquot

In Language and Linguistics

1. Beth Herbel-Eisenmann
2. Alison Wray
3. Paul Baker
4. Yu-Hua Chen
5. Sylviane Granger
6. Magali Paquot
7. D. Wagner
8. Rita Simpson-Vlach

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Beth Herbel-Eisenmann
2. Paul Baker
3. Yu-Hua Chen
4. D. Wagner
5. Nick C. Ellis
6. Rita Simpson-Vlach
7. Viviana Cortes
8. Alison Wray

Citations in the corpus

• What Do We (Think We) Know About Formulaic Language? An Evaluation of the Current State of Play (2012, methodology): “With corpus methods the dominant approach to examining this question, there is an impressive range of recent descriptive (e.g., Biber, 2009; Biber & Barbieri, 2007) and explanatory studies.”
• Investigating Criterial Discourse Features across Second Language Development: Lexical Bundles in Rated Learner Essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1 (2014, methodology): “2004; Cortes 2004; Biber and Barbieri 2007; Hyland 2008). These high frequency sequences largely straddle the boundary between lexis and syntax, functioning as ‘basic building blocks of discourse’ (Biber et al. 2004: 371). Adopting a structural and functional taxonomy from Biber and his colleagues (”
• An Academic Formulas List: New Methods in Phraseology Research (2010, background): “EAP research (e.g. Swales 1990; Flowerdew and Peacock 2001; Hyland 2004, 2008; Biber and Barbieri 2006) focuses on determining the functional patterns and constructions of different academic genres.”
• Lexical bundle analysis in mathematics classroom discourse: the significance of stance (2010, methodology): “When comparing different-sized corpora, the process of normalization by scaling to one millions words is common in lexical bundle analysis (e.g., Biber & Barbieri, 2007, p. 268 ).”
• Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing (2010, positive): “The functional categorization adopted here follows the taxonomy devised by Biber and colleagues (Biber & Barbieri, 2007; Biber et al., 2003, 2004).”
• Formulaic Language in Learner Corpora (2012, methodology): “Corpus linguistic tools and methods have been instrumental in establishing the links between formulaic language and text structuring (e.g., Biber & Barbieri, 2007; Conrad & Biber, 2004; Simpson-Vlach & Ellis, 2010).”