E. F. Stone-Romero

Sociology and Political Science · 2003–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 11 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom E. F. Stone-Romero trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Kenneth A. Bollen
  2. W. Shadish
  3. Paul Holland
  4. T. D. Cook
  5. John E. Mathieu
  6. David P. MacKinnon
  7. Kristopher J Preacher
  8. G. Stewart
  9. Patrick J. Rosopa
  10. S. Restubog

Who trusts E. F. Stone-Romero overall

  1. Kristopher J Preacher
  2. David A. Kenny
  3. John E. Mathieu
  4. Dawn S. Carlson
  5. Mark M. Suazo
  6. Richard P. DeShon
  7. Herman Aguinis
  8. Rex Bryan Kline
  9. J. Grzywacz
  10. Thomas Rockstuhl

Papers from E. F. Stone-Romero's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers E. F. Stone-Romero trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior
  2. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference
  3. Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration
  4. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  5. The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  6. Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type
  7. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: evolution, culture, mind, and brain
  8. Aversive Racism and Selection Decisions: 1989 and 1999 (Psychology Science)
  9. BREACH AND FULFILLMENT OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT: A COMPARISON OF TRADITIONAL AND EXPANDED VIEWS
  10. The mediating role of psychological contract violation on the relations between psychological contract breach and work‐related attitudes and behaviors

Their papers