Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: evolution, culture, mind, and brain

By Susan T. Fiske. 2000

1,837 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8bda1579994d42bca9faf5647712976619d5a4d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Interactions Within Groups and Subgroups: The Effects of Demographic Faultlines (2005, neutral): “sonal characteristics (Fiske, 2000), but the impact”
Stigma in the HIV/AIDS epidemic: A review of the literature and recommendations for the way forward (2008, background): “Although important, these approaches exclude a detailed consideration of structural aspects of stigma; the dynamic social/ economic/political processes that simultaneously produce and intensify stigma and discrimination [8,14,15].”
Gender, Status, and Leadership (2001, background): “Sex categorization, in turn, automatically activates gender stereotypes, including gender status beliefs, and primes them to affect judgments (see Fiske, 1998).”
The Joy of Sexism? A Multinational Investigation of Hostile and Benevolent Justifications for Gender Inequality and Their Relations to Subjective Well-Being (2010, background): “…women—are rationalized by the use of complementary (or “ambivalent”) stereotypes (Cuddy and Fiske 2002; Deaux and Lewis 1984; Eagly and Steffen 1984; Fiske 1998; Fiske et al. 2002; Fiske et al. 1999; Jost and Kay 2005; Jost et al. 2005; Kay and Jost 2003; Kay et al. 2005; Kay et al. 2007;…”
You've got mail: Using e-mail to examine the effect of prejudiced attitudes on discrimination against Arabs (2004, neutral): “(Fiske, 1998).”
Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis. (2005, background): “Even when there is a “kernel” of truth to a stereotype, stereotypes are typically stronger and more pervasive than the kernel would justify (S. T. Fiske, 1998), presumably because the strength and consistency of a phenomenon are exaggerated in perceivers’ minds, augmented by processes such as…”
Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. (2004, background): “Because stereotypes can be highly prescriptive (e.g., sex stereotypes do not merely describe how women and men are but also prescribe how they should be; Fiske, 1998), expectancy violations can then result in social or economic sanctions for counterstereotypical behavior (i.”
The Impact of Respect Versus Neglect of Self-Identities on Identification and Group Loyalty (2002, background): “In fact, perceivers readily use visible cues, such as gender, race, and age, to categorize targets (Fiske, 1998), whereas targets’ subjective identities do not necessarily correspond to their most visible group memberships at all times (Deaux, 1996; Tajfel, 1981).”
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. (2002, background): “Consistent with social role theory (Eagly, 1987; Eagly et al., 2000) and social–cognitive research (see S. T. Fiske, 1998), gender roles have pervasive effects.”
Can Information about Pandemics Increase Negative Attitudes toward Foreign Groups? A Case of COVID-19 Outbreak (2020, background): “Prejudice relates to an affective component of attitudes and, along with stereotypes (cognitive components) and discrimination (behavioral component), describes barriers in intergroup relations [17].”