Followership theory: A review and research agenda ☆

1,070 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Destructive Leadership: A Critique of Leader-Centric Perspectives and Toward a More Holistic Definition (2016, background): “Consistent with Uhl-Bien et al. (2014), we argue that destructive leadership processes require combined acts of dysfunctional leading and following, which are left unchecked in the environment.”
Does Entrepreneurial Leadership Foster Creativity Among Employees and Teams? The Mediating Role of Creative Efficacy Beliefs (2019, background): “…with their supervisors (i.e. initiating changes, taking risks and being open to new ventures) may lead to an increased willingness to contribute creatively to opportunitydriven goals and outcomes (Gupta et al. 2004; Koseoglu et al. 2017; Uhl-Bien et al. 2014; Van Knippenberg and Hogg 2003).”
Debunking the false dichotomy of leadership idealism and pragmatism: Critical evaluation and support of newer genre leadership theories (2014, background): “determination over whether they will be led and thereby more fully open themselves to the leader’s influence and more fully engage in their work (DeRue & Ashford, 2010; Hollander, 1992a, 1992b; Uhl-Bien et al., 2014).”