Talking about time: Effects of temporal planning and time awareness norms on group coordination and performance.

By Gregory A. Janicik, Caroline A. Bartel. 2003

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f2aa33a00dd3959b3a755cc3e02c658b686c2657

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. V. Venkatesh
2. J. Hackman
3. Eduardo Salas
4. Anju Mehta
5. Pankaj C. Patel
6. Likoebe Mohau Maruping
7. John E. Mathieu
8. G. Goodwin

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Pankaj C. Patel
2. J. Hackman
3. John E. Mathieu
4. Caroline Aubé
5. Vincent Rousseau
6. Likoebe Mohau Maruping
7. Eduardo Salas
8. Michael R. Kukenberger

In Social Psychology

1. John E. Mathieu
2. Eduardo Salas
3. J. Hackman
4. Caroline Aubé
5. Vincent Rousseau
6. Pankaj C. Patel
7. Herman Aguinis
8. Michael R. Kukenberger

Citations in the corpus

• The Influence of Team Knowledge and Formal Plans on Episodic Team Process-Performance Relationships (2006, background): “In contrast, Janicik and Bartel (2003) found that strategic planning related to team performance both directly and indirectly, via mediation by team coordination processes.”
• A Cross-Level Test of Empowerment and Process Influences on Members’ Informal Learning and Team Commitment (2015, background): “…goal specification, strategy, and planning) have been shown to contribute to performance through factors such as the use of time management (Hiller, Day, & Vance, 2006; Janicik & Bartel, 2003), dynamic planning (Mathieu & Schulze, 2006), and deliberate plans and charters (Mathieu & Rapp, 2009).”
• Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future (2008, unknown): “As an example of such research, Janicik and Bartel (2003) found that planning contributed to the development of norms concerning how teams would manage time (e.g., deadlines).”
• Team Goal Orientation and Team Performance: The Mediating Role of Team Planning (2009, methodology): “Past research has also demonstrated the specific link between team planning and team performance (e.g., Janicik & Bartel, 2003; Weingart, 1992).”
• Team Self-Managing Behaviors and Team Effectiveness: The Moderating Effect of Task Routineness (2010, background): “…of selfmanagement and team (or group) performance, previous studies tended to focus on specific facets of TSMB, such as planning (e.g., Janicik & Bartel, 2003; Mehta et al., 2009; Weingart, 1992; Weldon, Jehn, & Pradham, 1991), monitoring (e.g., Marks & Panzer, 2004; Weldon et al.,…”
• Folding Under Pressure or Rising to the Occasion? Perceived Time Pressure and the Moderating Role of Team Temporal Leadership (2014, background): “Janicik and Bartel (2003) noted that temporal awareness trains teams to respond effectively to temporal conditions such as time pressure.”
• Why individuals in larger teams perform worse (2012, background): “Why individuals in larger tea (2011), doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.08.004 that the group was poorly planned and disorganized (Janicik & Bartel, 2003).”
• The centrality of communication norm alignment, role clarity, and trust in global project teams (2016, background): “Past research has demonstrated that group norms in general on projects can minimize coordination problems and positively impact task performance (Janicik and Bartel, 2003), and communication agreements in particular among distributed team members have been shown to minimize misunderstandings that de”
• A theory of team coaching (2005, background): “When work teams spontaneously engage in planning activities in their initial team meetings, process management norms sometimes emerge that are subsequently helpful in pacing and coordinating team activities (Janicik & Bartel, 2003).”
• What makes a good team player? Personality and team effectiveness. (2006, background): “Janicik and Bartel (2003) noted that effective coordination, knowing who is going to do what, when, and with whom, is critical to team performance.”
• It’s About Time: New Perspectives and Insights on Time Management (2017, background): “Many such structures are time-based, which shouldn’t be surprising because a defining feature of teams is interdependence (Cannon-Bowers & Bowers, 2011), and the best way to ensure seamless interdependence is temporal coordination (Janicik & Bartel, 2003; Okhuysen & Bechky, 2009).”