The Influence of Team Knowledge and Formal Plans on Episodic Team Process-Performance Relationships

By John E. Mathieu, W. Schulze. 2006

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ce258cee2c6fb1b2dab4fd83ad9e35819e4c58e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Work-Unit Absenteeism: Effects of Satisfaction, Commitment, Labor Market Conditions, and Time (2008, unknown): “Recent examples of RCM applications in the organizational literature are available (e.g., Chen, 2005; Day, Sin, & Chen; 2004; Mathieu & Schulze, 2006; Ployhart, Weekley, & Baughman, 2006; Thoresen, Bradley, Bliese, & Thoresen, 2004).”
Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future (2008, methodology): “For example, Mathieu and Schulze (2006) found that teams with high levels of task-related knowledge not only performed better but were better able to execute transition processes.”
Multilevel Research in the Field of Organizational Behavior (2013, background): “According to Rousseau (2011), simulations are extremely useful to study effects over time, as they reduce the typical complications associated with longitudinal designs and are being successfully adopted by some authors (Mathieu & Schulze, 2006; Santos & Passos, in press).”
The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis. (2010, background): “(Mathieu & Schulze, 2006, p. 609) (1995) meta-analysis of team cohesion and performance ( (cid:1) cohesion–performance (cid:2) .317).”
Team adaptation in context: An integrated conceptual model and meta-analytic review (2017, background): “While task-related knowledge positively impacts performance in routine situations (e.g., Mathieu & Schulze, 2006), predictions are less clear in adaptive contexts.”
A Longitudinal Examination of the Relationship Between Team Leadership and Performance (2010, methodology): “Not surprising, student teams’ making decisions in simulated industries has emerged as a popular context for team research in recent years (Marks, 2000; Mathieu & Schulze, 2006).”
Conflict, Participative Decision‐Making, and Generational Ownership Dispersion: A Multilevel Analysis* (2008, methodology): “Multilevel theory and methods have been rarely used in strategy and team research, though there are a few exceptions that shed new light on interesting relationships (e.g., Mathieu and Schulze 2006; Misangyi et al. 2006).”
Time in applied psychology: The study of "what happens" rather than "what is." (2008, background): “Mathieu and Schulze (2006) proposed a time-based theory of team behaviors in which team attributesare expectedtoinfluenceepisodictran-sitions and interpersonal processes, as well as team performance.”
Understanding and improving teamwork in organizations: a scientifically based practical guide (2015, background): “…that effective coordination at the multiteam system level—that is, coordinated actions between the component teams comprising the system— also aided in the facilitation of coordination within component teams (de Jong, de Ruyter, & Wetzels, 2005; Kirkman & Rosen, 1999; Mathieu & Schulze, 2006).”
Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams (2012, background): “…studies of team knowledge have assumed that knowledge content provides the raw materials for generating new knowledge (Cruz, Perez, & Ramos, 2007; Mathieu & Schulze, 2006), whereas knowledge processes enable teams to apply relevant knowledge and thus activate the value of such knowledge in team…”
A Cross-Level Test of Empowerment and Process Influences on Members’ Informal Learning and Team Commitment (2015, background): “…goal specification, strategy, and planning) have been shown to contribute to performance through factors such as the use of time management (Hiller, Day, & Vance, 2006; Janicik & Bartel, 2003), dynamic planning (Mathieu & Schulze, 2006), and deliberate plans and charters (Mathieu & Rapp, 2009).”