Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production and acquisition

By Björn Hammarberg. 2001

422 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0aa7027809b577136acbedbdb09303ca6d6a32a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

L2-accented speech in L3 production (2010, background): “…or L2 status, has attracted special attention of several researchers (e.g. Bannert, 2005; Cenoz, 2001; Fernandes-Boëchat & Siebeneicher Brito, 2008; Gut, 2010; Hammarberg, 2001; Hammarberg & Hammarberg, 1993, 2005; Jessner, 2006; Llama, Cardoso, & Collins, 2010; Williams & Hammarberg, 1998).”
What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state (2010, background): “…but it is privileged at the L3 initial state, because of the so-called ‘L2 status factor’ – borrowing the label from Williams and Hammarberg (1998) and Hammarberg (2001), who applied it to the L3 lexicon – in the sense that L2 morphosyntax blocks straightforward access to the L1 (for related…”
The role of the second language in third language acquisition: the case of Germanic syntax (2007, background): “It has been proposed that L2 status is an important factor in L3 acquisition: Williams and Hammarberg (1998) and Hammarberg (2001) suggest that among the languages known to the learner – L1 and L2(s) – the L2 is more likely to have an impact on the process of L3 acquisition.”
The influence of language distance and language status on the acquisition of L3 phonology (2010, positive): “This is the case of lexis (Cenoz, 2001; De Angelis & Selinker, 2001; Dewaele, 1998; Hammarberg, 2001; Möhle, 1989; Ringbom, 2001; Tremblay, 2006), with syntax receiving increasing attention (Bardel, 2006; Bardel & Falk, 2007; Leung, 2005).”
Metalinguistic awareness mediates effects of full biliteracy on third-language reading proficiency in Turkish–German bilinguals (2012, background): “Although from the theory of third language development (e.g., Hammarberg, 2001; Herdina, & Jessner, 2002; Hufeisen, 2000) there is reason to assume that metalinguistic awareness plays a causal role in L3 acquisition, from the present data, it could clearly be the other way round.”
When Swedes begin to learn German: from V2 to V2 (2006, background): “sion (e.g. Ringbom, 1987; 2001; Dentler, 2000: 84–93; Hammarberg, 2001) and, similarly, in L3 discourse, entire non-adapted language switches to the L1 and the L2 are widely attested (see, e.”
Same Source, Different Outcomes: A Study of Swedish Influence on the Acquisition of English in Finland (2004, background): “A follow-up study by Hammarberg (2001) of the same learner shows that her patterns of phonetic transfer changed as she became more proficient in Swedish.”
CROSSLINGUISTIC INFLUENCE AND CONCEPTUAL TRANSFER: WHAT ARE THE CONCEPTS? (2005, result): “…147) His notion of “habitual” thought might sound behaviorist, but elsewhere he made his skepticism about behaviorism clear, and indeed his ideas seem more consonant with recent ones framed within the theoretical concept of “automaticity” (e.g., Dewaele, 2001; Hammarberg, 2001; Segalowitz, 2003).”
L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model (2011, methodology): “Following suggestions in this direction from previous work in other domains by Williams and Hammarberg (1998) and Hammarberg (2001), Bardel and Falk go beyond their demonstration that L2 morphosyntactic transfer is possible into the L3, claiming that it is privileged at the L3 initial state.”
The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning* (2014, background): “Indeed, there is evidence that typological distance, especially when comparing L1 and L2 to L3, has been found to affect L3 acquisition (Cenoz, 2001; Hammarberg, 1997, 2001).”