The role of the second language in third language acquisition: the case of Germanic syntax

By C. Bardel, Ylva Falk. 2007

509 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4d1e2306e95d8b2b6a8c570a86bdb9fcdfd3382

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered* (2013, methodology): “The L2 Status Factor maintains that the L2 takes on a significantly stronger role than the L1 in the initial stages of L3 morphosyntactic acquisition (e.g. Bardel & Falk, 2007; Falk & Bardel, 2011).”
Clitics and object expression in the L3 acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese: Structural similarity matters for transfer (2011, background): “Bardel and Falk (2007), who also found influence from the L2 in the acquisition of Swedish as L3 by speakers of English, Romance and Germanic languages with V2 as L1 or L2 claimed that the role of the L2 is quite strong in L3 acquisition. In a study of structures related to the Null Subject paramete”
What is special about L3 processing?* (2013, background): “Bardel and Falk (2007) extended this research to show that L1 knowledge of a certain feature can be blocked, if the same feature is not present in the L2.”
L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model (2011, background): “This article endeavors to test three such proposals: the Cumulative Enhancement Model (Flynn et al., 2004); the ‘L2 status factor’ (Bardel and Falk, 2007) and the Typological Primacy Model (see Section III).”
What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state (2010, methodology): “While this has changed in recent years (e.g. Flynn et al., 2004; Leung 2005; 2006; 2007a; 2007b; Bardel, 2006; Bohnacker, 2006; Bardel and Falk, 2007; Jaensch, 2008; 2009; Cabrelli Amaro et al., 2009), such studies comprise an infinitesimal part of all generative studies investigating adult non-prim”
Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model (2017, background): “…interest in L3 acquisition (L3A) in formal approaches to language, with numerous studies investigating a variety of language combinations (e.g. Bardel & Falk, 2007, 2012; Berkes & Flynn, 2012; Dias & Santos, 2011; Flynn, Foley & Vinnitskaya, 2004; Hermas, 2015; Jin, 2009; Leung, 2003;…”
The influence of language distance and language status on the acquisition of L3 phonology (2010, background): “Although less common than studies on L1 influence, there is a growing body of research on L2's as potential sources of transfer, with some studies finding that both the L1 and the L2 may play a role in the acquisition of an L3 (Bardel & Falk, 2007 ; Cenoz, 2001 ; Dewaele, 1998 ; Ringbom, 2001 ; ”
The role of L1 explicit metalinguistic knowledge in L3 oral production at the initial state* (2013, methodology): “According to the L2 status factor (Bardel & Falk, 2007; Falk & Bardel, 2010, 2011), a previously formally learned L2 is more likely to transfer into an L3 due to the many cognitive and situational characteristics that a formally learned L2 and a formally learned L3 have in common (among others, the…”
A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition (2018, background): “…used, significant associations were found between either production or comprehension-based methodologies and two of the macro-variables: L2 only transfer (e.g., Bardel and Falk, 2007; Tavakol and Jabbari, 2014) and Hybrid transfer (e.g., Angelovska, 2017; Fallah and Akbar Jabbari, 2016).”
Object pronouns in German L3 syntax: Evidence for the L2 status factor (2011, background): “, 2004; Leung, 2005, amongst others), and some studies even indicate a qualitative difference between the acquisition of a true L2 and the subsequent acquisition of an L3, in that L2 seems to take on a stronger role than the first language (L1) in L3 syntax in the initial state (Bardel and Falk, 200”
The scalpel model of third language acquisition (2017, background): “These are: the privileged L1 transfer hypothesis (Hermas, 2010; Jin, 2009; Na Ranong & Leung, 2009); the L2 status factor model (L2 status) (Bardel & Falk, 2007; Falk & Bardel, 2011); the cumulative enhancement model (CEM) (Flynn, Foley, & Vinnitskaya, 2004); and the typological primacy model (TPM)…”