Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills

By Alicia. Sandman. 2010

1,257 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee7d7e580bd879790e65101f1fdb494a5e15fa82

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. S. Vaughn
2. D. Browder
3. A. Vanderheyden
4. Kristen L. McMaster
5. Sylvia Linan-Thompson
6. Patricia F. Vadasy
7. E. Sanders
8. Claudia Flowers

In Education

1. S. Vaughn
2. A. Vanderheyden
3. Kristen L. McMaster
4. Sylvia Linan-Thompson
5. E. Sanders
6. Patricia F. Vadasy
7. D. Browder
8. Roxanne F. Hudson

In Statistics and Probability

1. S. Vaughn
2. D. Browder
3. A. Vanderheyden
4. Sylvia Linan-Thompson
5. E. Sanders
6. Patricia F. Vadasy
7. E. Shapiro
8. Kristen L. McMaster

Citations in the corpus

• Long-Term Diagnostic Accuracy of Curriculum-Based Measures in Reading and Mathematics (2008, background): “Another potential concern may be raised about the use of the benchmark scores recommended by measures such as the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS; Good & Kaminski, 2002).”
• Efficacy of supplemental phonics-based instruction for low-skilled kindergarteners in the context of language minority status and classroom phonics instruction. (2010, methodology): “We developed our own measures of alphabetics; however, they are highly similar to the letter name task in Fuchs et al. (2001) and the letter name fluency subtest from the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (Good & Kaminski, 2002).”
• Video Self-Modeling on an iPad to Teach Functional Math Skills to Adolescents With Autism and Intellectual Disability (2013, background): “The Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS; Good & Kaminski, 2002) assessment indicated Joey was reading fourth-grade level text at a rate of 187 words per minute with 99% accuracy.”
• Response to Intervention for Social Behavior (2008, background): “DIBELS are 1-minute, fluency-based measures that are designed not to comprehensively measure reading performance but rather to indicate a student’s overall early literacy health (Good & Kaminski, 2001).”
• Development of a new reading comprehension assessment: Identifying comprehension differences among readers (2014, methodology): “ORF consists of a set of standardized passages that participants read aloud for 1 min each.”
• Is Scientifically Based Reading Instruction Effective for Students With Below-Average IQs? (2014, methodology): “We used Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills 293 292 Spring 2014 (DIBELS; Good & Kaminski, 2002) to monitor progress, following all standard procedures, except that we administered subtests intended for first grade to all participants regardless of grade placement.”