How Many Studies Do You Need?
By J. Valentine, Terri D. Pigott, H. Rothstein. 2010
1,023 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/978e0555c4666bd51d4912b4de74c7a8b12a0247
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Blend Ibrahim
- Shinichi Nakagawa
- Hope Rigby-Wills
- Liesbeth Kester
- David C.D. van Alten
- Chris Phielix
- Alyson A. Collins
- Steve Graham
In Statistics and Probability
- Matthew J. Page
- J. Koricheva
- J. Gurevitch
- Blend Ibrahim
- M. Lagisz
- David Moher
- Shinichi Nakagawa
- G. Stewart
Citations in the corpus
- Social Media Marketing Activities and Brand Loyalty: A Meta-Analysis Examination (2021, background): “When conducting a meta-analysis, some researchers claim that if there are only two studies and equal, statistically significant effects in the same direction, perhaps the intervention is operative (Cooper, 2003; Valentine et al., 2010).”
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021, background): “…any combination of too few available studies, small sample sizes within studies, or high amounts of variability between study effects, and therefore justification of meta-regression models should include consideration of sample sizes (Item 20) and heterogeneity (Item 22) (Valentine et al., 2010).”
- The Extended Transportation-Imagery Model: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers' Narrative Transportation (2014, neutral): “This number is insufficient to provide meaningful insight into the extent to which a factor may have an influence (Valentine, Pigott, and Rothstein 2010); therefore, our model does not include medium.”