Assessing Risk for Sexual Recidivism: Some Proposals on the Nature of Psychologically Meaningful Risk Factors

By R. Mann, R. K. Hanson, D. Thornton. Sexual abuse. A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2010

884 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd26b707e2da021cd14d51f2f663f40f1889fe43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Martin Schmucker
2. F. Lösel
3. C. Hollin
4. K. Dobson
5. J. Levenson
6. David A. D'Amora
7. David P. Farrington
8. Maria M. Ttofi

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Martin Schmucker
2. F. Lösel
3. C. Hollin
4. K. Dobson
5. J. Levenson
6. David A. D'Amora

Citations in the corpus

• The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: an international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations (2015, background): “Although there is much research on risk factors f r reoffending and structured assessment instruments (e.g. Hanson & Morton-Bourgon, 2009), the knowledge about the origins and causal mechanisms is less clear (e.g. Mann et al., 2010; Ward et al., 2005).”
• Sexual offender treatment for reducing recidivism among convicted sex offenders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2017, background): “Although there is much research on static and dynamic risk factors for reoffending and structured risk assessment instruments (e.g. Hanson & Morton-Bourgon, 2009), the knowledge about the origins and causal mechanisms is less clear (e.g. Mann et al., 2010; Ward et al., 2005).”