The Structure of Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Dimensionality and Relationships with Facets of Job Performance

By P. Sackett. 2002

449 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6c879c54a69cd37cf738eab52baa70c7fefbbc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Leader Narcissism Predicts Malicious Envy and Supervisor-Targeted Counterproductive Work Behavior: Evidence from Field and Experimental Research (2018, unknown): “Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) comprises ‘‘any intentional behavior on the part of an organization member viewed by the organization as contrary to its legitimate interests’’ (Sackett 2002, p. 5).”
Getting even with one's supervisor and one's organization: relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge, and counterproductive work behaviors (2009, background): “The term counterproductive work behavior (CWB) describes behaviors by organizational members that are counter to the organization’s legitimate interests (Sackett, 2002).”
Destructive Leadership (2013, background): “This distinction is echoed in the job performance literature, which has concluded that CWBs should be distinguished from poor task performance (Murphy, 1989; Sackett, 2002).”
Psychological Contracts and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Employee Responses to Transactional and Relational Breach (2010, background): “and are contrary to the organization’s legitimate interests (Sackett 2002).”
Daily customer mistreatment and employee sabotage against customers: Examining emotion and resource perspectives. (2011, background): “Therefore, examination of these behaviors often relies on measures that estimate average numbers or frequencies of occurrence over a certain time period (Sackett, 2002).”
Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies (2017, background): “While OCB and CWB are negatively related in most studies (e.g., Sackett, 2002; Sackett & DeVore, 2001), this need not be the case in all situations.”
A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO (2019, background): “Both forms are costly and detrimental for the organization and can vary in severity (Henle et al., 2005; Sackett, 2002).”
An approach-avoidance framework of workplace aggression (2016, background): “This wealth of constructs has led to a lively, thriving research community, but has also stimulated the repeated observation that many of these constructs seem similar (e.g., Hershcovis, 2011; Sackett, 2002; Spector & Fox, 2005; Tepper & Henle, 2011).”
Personality and absenteeism: a meta‐analysis of integrity tests (2003, background): “…dependability, integrity, and honesty of applicants to help predict theft and future on-the-job deviant behaviours (Ones, 2002; Ones & Viswesvaran, in press-a; Sackett, 2002), are considered to be the prototypical criterion-focused occupational personality scales (Ones & Viswesvaran, 2001a, 2001b).”
Big Five trait predictors of differential counterproductive work behavior dimensions (2010, background): “Specifically, our aim was to determine if Spector et al. (2006) five-dimensional classification of CWBs provided more nuanced relationships with the Big Five trait predictors than the one- and two-dimensional conceptualizations used in past research.”
Narcissism and Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of Linear and Nonlinear Relationships (2015, unknown): “…coincides with a larger trend in the field of organizational psychology toward building a more thorough understanding of negative workplace behaviors (e.g., counterproductive work behaviors [CWB], abusive supervision, and incivility; Andersson & Pearson, 1999; Sackett, 2002; Tepper, 2000).”