Working hard or hardly working: A study of individuals engaging in personal business on the job

By Caroline P. D'Abate. 2005

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da7dd27d173a6fd890537a322b22c0d44dafd77c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Personality and Leadership Developmental Levels as predictors of leader performance (2009, background): “Although small sample sizes are not atypical for interview-based data collectionmethods (e.g., D'Abate, 2005), the small sample size used in this study is likely to have limited Power, or the ability to detect a significant effect.”
On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review (2010, background): “…to the work domain in studying the meaning of work, experiences in non-work domains play an important role in the meaning of work as well (Brief & Nord, 1990c; Champoux, 1981; D’Abate, 2005; Greenberg, 1953; Kabanoff, 1980; Near et al., 1980; Snir & Harpaz, 2002; Thompson & Bunderson, 2001).”
Engaging in Personal Business on the Job: Extending the Presenteeism Construct. (2007, background): “A number of factors explain why individuals may engage in these forms of personal business on the job (D’Abate, 2005).”
Understanding non-work presenteeism: Relationships between emotional intelligence, boredom, procrastination and job stress (2014, unknown): “Further to this, a lack of motivation to work through job requirements may lead to feelings of boredom and provide idle time, allowing employees to engage in non-work related activities (D’Abate, 2005).”
Play at Work: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research (2018, background): “To this end, play can be perceived as counterproductive and disruptive, as it can subvert organizational order and control (Costea, Crump, & Holm, 2005; D’Abate, 2005).”