What Are the Characteristics of “Effective” Middle and High School Co-Taught Teams for Students With Disabilities?

By Lisa A. Dieker. 2001

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d93f5721fcbe01c2c84509859c81e6fb5cb04c31

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Education

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Co-Teaching at the Secondary Level: Unique Issues, Current Trends, and Suggestions for Success (2003, background): “Teachers delivering effective practices in co-taught settings use these tools in their teaching to address the differences in students’ learning needs while at the same time creating a positive climate (Dieker, 2001b).”
Student Outcomes in Co-Taught Secondary English Classes: How Can We Improve? (2006, background): “Access to the general curriculum and the opportunities for increased instructional options are two frequently cited rationales for co-teaching arrangements (Bauwens & Hourcade, 1997; Cook & Friend, 1995; Dieker, 2001; Murawski, 2002b).”
50 Ways to Keep Your Co-Teacher (2008, background): “Dieker (2001) demonstrated through research that veteran coteachers only need about 10 minutes to plan for a week; however, those teachers had previously cotaught.”
Observing Co-Teaching: What to Ask For, Look For, and Listen For (2011, unknown): “…cited for students in co-taught classes include increased individual attention (Zigmond, Magiera, & Matta, 2003), reduced negative behaviors (Dieker, 2001), improved self-esteem and social skills (WaltherThomas, 1997), and increased academic achievement (Murawski, 2006; Rea, McLaughlin, &…”
An Examination of Co-Teaching (2009, methodology): “All of the survey items were developed according to information found in previous co-teaching literature (Austin, 2001; Cook & Friend, 1995; Dieker, 2001; Dieker & Murawski, 2003; Fennick & Liddy, 2001; Gerber & Popp, 1999; Keefe & Moore, 2004; Murawski & Swanson, 2001; Noonan, McCormick, & Heck, 20”
Preparing Special Educators for Collaboration in the Classroom: Pre-Service Teachers' Beliefs and Perspectives. (2014, unknown): “…are often faulted for insufficient training in collaboration skills for special educators (Austin, 2001; Billingsley, 2004; Cook & Friend, 1995; Deiker, 2001; Friend, 2000; Greene & Isaacs, 1999; Keefe & Moore, 2004; Keefe, Moore, & Duff, 2004; Laframboise, Epanchin, Colucci, & Hocutt, 2004;…”
Differential Effects of Peer Tutoring in Co-Taught and Non-Co-Taught Classes: Results for Content Learning and Student-Teacher Interactions (2009, background): “Furthermore, research supports that peer tutoring (Mastropieri & Scruggs) and co-teaching (Dieker, 2001; Mastropieri, Scruggs, & Graetz, 2005; Walther-Thomas, 1997) increase engaged time on tasks.”
INSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITIES AND GROUP WORK IN THE US INCLUSIVE HIGH SCHOOL CO-TAUGHT SCIENCE CLASS (2009, methodology): “We compared our interview data with findings form Dieker (2001) , Cawley et al. (2002), and Morocco & Aguilar (2002), considered successful co-teaching cases, all of whom report abundant hands-on instruction and group work.”
Tips and Strategies for Co-Teaching at the Secondary Level (2004, background): “According to Dieker (2001), secondary teams can plan a lesson on the average in 10 minutes or less, assuming that relationship building occurred before co-teaching.”
Co-Teaching in Inclusive Classrooms: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research (2007, background): “…techniques that might have been expected were only rarely observed, such as principles of effective instruction (Mastropieri et al., 2005; Tarrant, 1999; Westberg, 2001); differentiated instruction (Tarrant; Yoder, 2000); appropri- 410 Summer 2007 ate curriculum (Dieker, 2001; Mastropieri et al.)”