Changes in Self-Efficacy, Challenge Avoidance, and Intrinsic Value in Response to Grades: The Role of Achievement Goals
By S. Shim, Allison M. Ryan. 2005
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d605a90e766515917eb9e32e9dead7230e9207dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Kou Murayama
- A. Elliot
- Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
- Paul A. O’Keefe
- Akane Zusho
- Keith D. Ciani
- Michael J. Middleton
- Matthew A. Easter
In Safety Research
- A. Elliot
- Kou Murayama
- W. Law
- Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
- Michael J. Middleton
- Paul A. O’Keefe
- N. Schwabsky
- M. Balduf
In Social Psychology
- Kou Murayama
- A. Elliot
- Paul A. O’Keefe
- Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
- Akane Zusho
- Keith D. Ciani
- W. Law
- Michael J. Middleton
Citations in the corpus
- An assessment arms race and its fallout: high-stakes grading and the case for slow scholarship (2015, background): “Grading is known to influence motivation, beliefs and behaviours (Shim and Ryan 2005), and so with frequent grading, any influences will be continually reinforced and more pronounced.”
- School climate, academic self-efficacy and student achievement (2020, methodology): “Grades are of the most salient form of performance feedback for students and are often the basis for career decisions (Shim & Ryan, 2005).”
- Different goals, different pathways to success: Performance-approach goals as direct and mastery-approach goals as indirect predictors of grades in mathematics (2018, unknown): “Regarding performance-avoidance goals, we expected, in line with prior studies which have highlighted their maladaptive nature (Jagacinski et al., 2008; Shim & Ryan, 2005), to relate negatively to challenge seeking and grades (Hypothesis 3).”
- The Strength of the Relation Between Performance-Approach and Performance-Avoidance Goal Orientations: Theoretical, Methodological, and Instructional Implications (2012, background): “…Pajares, 2001; Pajares & Cheong, 2003; Pekrun et al., 2006, 2009; Pugh et al., 2010; Ross et al., 2002; Ryan, Patrick, & Shim, 2005; Shih, 2005; Shim & Ryan, 2005; Sideridis, 2005b, 2006; M. Smith et al., 2002; Tanaka & Yamauchi, 2001; Van Yperen, 2006; Zusho et al., 2005) and a few studies in…”
- Perceived competence moderates the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals (2012, result): “…decidedly mixed results with regard to this hypothesis, with some studies providing support (Covington & Omelich, 1984; Elliott & Dweck, 1988; Shim & Ryan, 2005) but a majority not providing support (Harackiewicz, Barron, Carter, Lehto, & Elliot, 1997; Kaplan & Midgley, 1997; Lieberman &…”
- Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012, background): “R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research.”
- Underachievement Among College Students (2009, background): “Shim and Ryan (2005) found that students who valued mastery—mastering the content regardless of the academic gain—had higher motivation, while performance-avoidance—shying away from challenge and situations that could result in failure—related to lower motivation.”