Fitting Engagement Into a Nomological Network

By Andrew J. Wefald, R. Reichard, S. A. Serrano. 2011

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4b40125f7637f6518c9265f8dae6c99bd4659ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Mohammed Yasin Ghadi
2. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
3. Marie Carasco-Saul
4. Woocheol Kim
5. Peter Caputi
6. Mário Fernando
7. Taesung Brian Kim

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Mohammed Yasin Ghadi
2. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
3. Marie Carasco-Saul
4. Woocheol Kim
5. Peter Caputi
6. Mário Fernando
7. Taesung Brian Kim
8. Wilmar B. Schaufeli

In Social Psychology

1. Reece Akhtar
2. Mohammed Yasin Ghadi
3. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
4. Marie Carasco-Saul
5. Woocheol Kim
6. Peter Caputi
7. Mário Fernando
8. Taesung Brian Kim

Citations in the corpus

• Leadership and Employee Engagement (2015, methodology): “Wefald, Reichard, and Serrano (2011) studied the interrelationships of multiple conceptualizations and measures of work engagement within the nomological network.”
• Transformational leadership and work engagement: The mediating effect of meaning in work (2013, background): “Work engagement is a relatively new construct that has been conceptualised by many (Wefald et al., 2011).”
• The engageable personality: Personality and trait EI as predictors of work engagement (2015, background): “Though studies have identified personality as determinants of engagement (see Inceoglu & Warr, 2011; Kim et al., 2009; Langelaan et al., 2006; Wefald et al., 2011) findings have been mixed as to which dimensions best predict engagement.”