Job design in temporal context: a career dynamics perspective

By Yitzhak Fried, Adam M. Grant, Ariel S. Levi, M. Hadani, Linda H. Slowik. 2007

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ccd9dda22102909d308c95de16879f89a6e8f7da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Mandatory Fun: Consent, Gamification and the Impact of Games at Work (2014, background): “how people respond to the nature of the task itself as in work design (Fried & Ferris, 1987; Fried et al., 2007; Grant, 2007, 2008a; Hackman & Oldham, 1980), and job crafting (Wrzesniewski & Dutton, 2001; Leana, Appelbaum, & Shevchuk, 2009; Berg, Wrzesniewski, & Dutton 2010; Berg, Grant, & Johnson, ”
Everyday working life: Explaining within-person fluctuations in employee well-being (2012, background): “Furthermore, the role of time and the dynamic relationships that evolve over time have been recognized as critical in theory development (Fried et al., 2007; Pitariu and Ployhart, 2010).”
Focus on opportunities as a mediator of the relationships between age, job complexity, and work performance (2010, unknown): “models ( Fried, Grant, Levi, Hadani, & Slowik, 2007 ).”
Reinterpreting Time in Fit Theory: Crafting and Recrafting Narratives of Fit in Medias Res (2011, background): “In terms of fit, employees may prefer a redemption sequence, where they begin with greater misfit and progress to higher levels of fit, because this is the expected progression of employment (Fried et al., 2007), and they can later contrast the experiences to perceive”
Optimising Employee Mental Health: The Relationship Between Intrinsic Need Satisfaction, Job Crafting, and Employee Well-Being (2013, background): “Most of the research on job crafting to date has been qualitative or theoretical in nature (e.g., Berg et al. 2010a, b; Fried et al. 2007; Lyons 2008; Wrzesniewski and Dutton 2001).”
Work design for different generational cohorts : Determining common and idiosyncratic job characteristics (2014, background): “They emphasize not only that employees’ jobs, attitudes, and behaviour develop and change over time (Fried et al., 2007), but also suggest that timerelated variables such as age, career stage or generational cohort should shape particular job characteristics.”
Can job crafting reduce job boredom and increase work engagement? A three-year cross-lagged panel study (2016, unknown): “…research indicates that older employees might perceive new challenges as stressful rather than energizing, or they may have reached a point in their careers at which they focus more on other goals, such as work-related relationships (Fried, Grant, Levi, Hadani, & Slowik, 2007; Baltes, 1977).”
Placing Job Characteristics in Context: Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of Changes in Job Characteristics Since 1975 (2018, methodology): “Next, the literature on work characteristics has seen something of a renaissance in recent years (cf. Campion, Mumford, Morgeson, & Nahrgang, 2005; Fried et al., 2007, 2008; Grant, 2007; Grant & Parker, 2009; Grant et al., 2010, 2011; Humphrey et al., 2007; Morgeson et al., 2010; Parker et al.,…”
Development and validation of the job crafting scale (2012, background): “Fried et al. (2007) proposed that employees may be more likely to craft stimulating jobs (i.e., craft more challenging job demands) when they feel that it will advance them in their careers.”
An introduction to contemporary work psychology (2014, background): “Fried et al. (2007) suggested that employees’ reactions to stimulating jobs, and their efforts to craft more stimulating jobs, may depend on temporal aspects of their career aspirations and expectations.”