Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research

By Ralph R. Radach, A. Kennedy. 2004

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5ed80d5ddfa65b5240c03eac94b3ba03aaf556a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading (2006, background): “Rather than promoting the all-or-none style explanations that dominated the field over the last two decades (Radach & Kennedy, 2004; Rayner, 1998), a dynamical systems approach can potentially accommodate accounts that argue for the interplay, over time, of linguistic and oculomotor factors.”
The Complex Nature of Reading Fluency: A Multidimensional View (2008, background): “E-mail: rhudson@u.washington.edu Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25: 4–32, 2009 Copyright # Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1057-3569 print=1521-0693 online DOI: 10.1080/10573560802491208 4 where less consensus has been established, including reading fluency.”
INCIDENTAL L2 VOCABULARY ACQUISITION FROM AND WHILE READING (2015, background): “Eye movements are “an inherent behavioural manifestation of the reading process in action” (Radach & Kennedy, 2004 , p. 4).”
A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012 (2013, methodology): “Meanwhile, according to the scale of measurement, Radach and Kennedy (2004) grouped word-based eye-tracking measures into two categories: a temporal scale (measured by time) and a spatial scale (measured by space).”
Eye movements when reading spaced and unspaced Thai and English : a comparison of Thai–English bilinguals and English monolinguals (2009, background): “…serves the more fundamental purpose of broadening the empirical base for the ongoing debate on how the human mind masters the task of reading, given the constraints imposed by different writing systems (Radach & Kennedy, 2004; Radach, Reilly, & Inhoff, 2007; Rayner, 1998; Reichle & Laurent, 2006).”
Eye movements in developing readers: A comparison of silent and oral sentence reading (2014, methodology): “3–4, 458–485, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2014.881445 research has contributed significantly to this progress (see Radach & Kennedy, 2004, 2013; Rayner, 1998, 2009 for reviews).”
Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis (2012, unknown): “…reading (Paulson & Jenry, 2002; Rayner, Chace, Slattery, & Ashby, 2006) and information processing (for a detailed review, see Rayner, 1998; Radach & Kennedy, 2004), arithmetic problem solving (Hegarty, Mayer, & Green, 1992; Verschaffel, De Corte, & Pauwels, 1992), human–computer…”