Leadership and individual differences: At the cusp of a renaissance

By John Antonakis, D. Day, B. Schyns. 2012

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3fab30530ffe4cedf493157615d5cbfc916ead9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Psychopathic Leadership A Case Study of a Corporate Psychopath CEO (2017, unknown): “Within the leadership literature, it has been asserted that methodological advancements are enabling a renaissance in individual difference research in leadership, potentially linking traits to behaviours and attitudes and then to leader outcomes (Antonakis et al. 2012).”
Further specification of the leader political skill–leadership effectiveness relationships: Transformational and transactional leader behavior as mediators (2013, background): “, 2002) – have received much of the attention during the resurgence of trait approaches to leadership (Antonakis et al., 2012).”
How Servant Leadership Influences Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Roles of LMX, Empowerment, and Proactive Personality (2017, background): “…the influence of servant leadership behavior, we address the calls of researchers for greater investigation into how individual differences among followers, such as personality, influence how they perceive and respond to different styles of leadership (Antonakis et al. 2012; Zaccaro 2012).”
Regulatory focus as a psychological micro-foundation of leaders' exploration and exploitation activities (2015, background): “Because regulatory focus may be an endogenous variable, when designing and testing models involving this construct, it is necessary to thoroughly consider possible omitted causes stemming from personality (e.g., Antonakis et al., 2012).”
The Relational Nature of Leadership Identity Construction: How and When It Influences Perceived Leadership and Decision-Making (2015, background): “Indeed, the results for both actor and respondent competence ratings highlight the need for greater consideration of the role of gender in the study of individual differences as predictors of leadership perceptions (Antonakis et al., 2012) and leadership identity construction.”
Transformational Leadership and Turnover Intentions: The Mediating Role of Employee Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021, background): “This research contributes to transformation leadership and work success literature and calls for a greater understanding of how performance influences turnover and different leadership types (Antonakis et al. 2012; Zaccaro 2012; Atkin-Plunk and Armstrong 2013).”
Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration (2017, background): “Antonakis et al. (2012) noted the proliferation and contributions of process models that attempted to arrange leader individual differences into sets of characteristics that predicted (a) distal leader traits, (b) proximal leader attributes, (c) leadership styles and leadership behavior, (d)…”