The Relational Nature of Leadership Identity Construction: How and When It Influences Perceived Leadership and Decision-Making

By Lisa A. Marchiondo, Christopher G. Myers, Shirli Kopelman. 2015

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a5d6998dff2837379c6f5b9d383641f77fa5a18

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. R. Lord
2. R. Kark
3. C. Mainemelis
4. Melissa G. Keith
5. P. D. Harms
6. Louis Tay
7. O. Epitropaki

In Social Psychology

1. R. Kark
2. O. Epitropaki
3. C. Mainemelis
4. R. Lord
5. P. D. Harms
6. Melissa G. Keith
7. Louis Tay
8. Bruce J. Avolio

In Sociology and Political Science

1. R. Lord
2. Louis Tay
3. Melissa G. Keith
4. P. D. Harms
5. O. Epitropaki
6. R. Kark
7. C. Mainemelis

Citations in the corpus

• Systems Perspective of Amazon Mechanical Turk for Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations (2017, methodology): “Inoursurvey of the organizational literature utilizing MTurk, the experimental manipulations used on MTurk ranged broadly from avatar video-based studies (Marchiondo et al., 2015), to vignette studies ( Kovács et al., 2014), to policy capturing (Young, 2016).”
• Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review ☆ (2017, background): “Recently, Marchiondo, Myers, and Kopelman (2015) empirically tested DeRue and Ashford's (2010) propositions.”