Putting appraisal in context: Toward a relational model of appraisal and emotion

By Craig A. Smith, Leslie D. Kirby. 2009

236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c29bc5ea01827315919fecb17b97d7e7a6f18986

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Moving from Marketization to Marketing of Higher Education: The Co-Creation of Value in Higher Education. (2014, background): “When evaluating an educational experience, students begin their appraisal by considering two aspects of the experience: the motivational relevance and the motivational congruence (Smith & Kirby, 2009).”
L2 motivation, anxiety and self-efficacy: The interrelationship of individual variables in the secondary school context (2013, background): “Carver (2001) describes self-regulating feedback systems where goal pursuit (motivation), assessment of the distance of the goal (also part of appraisal; cf. Smith & Kirby, 2009), experience, and affect interact.”
Bringing appraisal theory to environmental risk perception: a review of conceptual approaches of the past 40 years and suggestions for future research (2012, background): “Currently, three different models are distinguished – structural, process, and relational (Smith and Kirby 2000 , 2009 ).”
Understanding the power of the picture: the effect of image content on emotional and political responses to terrorism (2014, background): “Individuals’ appraisals of an event or situation may be shaped by their dispositional characteristics (e.g., personality traits), and by features of the situation (Smith & Kirby, 2009).”
Coping with Cyberbullying: Differences Between Victims, Bully‐victims and Children not Involved in Bullying (2013, unknown): “The primary appraisal process has been shown to influence the intensity of the experienced emotions such that when a situation is highly relevant to one’s wellbeing, it elicits a more intense emotional response (Smith & Kirby, 2009).”
Affect and leader-member exchange in the new millennium: A state-of-art review and guiding framework (2017, background): “In the primary stage of appraisal, the individual evaluates the two key motivational dimensions: relevance and congruence (Smith & Kirby, 2009).”
Emotions predict policy support: Why it matters how people feel about climate change (2018, background): “The advantage of such approaches is the ability to explain why individuals respond differently to the same environmental threats (Smith and Kirby, 2009).”
Are the sources of interest the same for everyone? Using multilevel mixture models to explore individual differences in appraisal structures (2009, background): “Other studies have examined individual differences in the tendency to make particular appraisals and how these differences contribute to emotion (eg, Dodge, 1993 ; Silvia, 2008a ; Smith & Kirby, 2009 this issue ; Smith & Pope, 1992 ; van Reekum & Scherer, 1997 ).”
Emotional Awareness: On the Importance of Including Emotional Aspects in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) (2013, unknown): “Emotions are seen as relational, as they focus on the implications of a situation for a person in light of this person‟s needs, hopes, goals, values, and abilities (Smith and Kirby, 2009).”