Bringing appraisal theory to environmental risk perception: a review of conceptual approaches of the past 40 years and suggestions for future research

By C. Keller, Ann Bostrom, Margôt Kuttschreuter, Lucia Savadori, Alexa Spence, M. White. 2012

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01781203d59d8d948357374156c1a494db8fa9e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. Iain Walker

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Z. Leviston
2. Xiongzhi Wang
3. Xiangru Qin
4. Susie Wang
5. Mark J. Hurlstone
6. Iain Walker
7. Yongbo Zhou
8. C. Lawrence

In Statistics and Probability

1. Yongbo Zhou

Citations in the corpus

• A comparative study of relative roles and sequences of cognitive and affective attitudes on tourists’ pro-environmental behavioral intention (2020, background): “Whereas for scholars in the “cognitive primacy” school, they draw on the appraisal theory to argue that things are cognitively appraised before engendering affective reactions (Keller et al., 2012).”
• Emotions predict policy support: Why it matters how people feel about climate change (2018, background): “A considerable body of work exists on triggers for emotions, mainly within appraisal-theoretical models of emotion, and particularly in perceptions of environmental risk (Keller et al., 2012; Böhm and Pfister, 2000).”