In Pursuit of Validity: A comprehensive review of science attitude instruments 1935–2005
By C. L. Blalock, M. Lichtenstein, S. Owen, L. Pruski, C. Marshall, M. A. Toepperwein. 2008
180 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c14fbeff9792481dbb3e1c5826d34e3e70a1152d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Jennifer Dewitt
- L. Archer
- Jonathan Osborne
- Xiaoying Xu
- J. Bennett
- Sylvia D. Hogarth
- B. Willis
- María Brígido
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- J. Bennett
- Sylvia D. Hogarth
- Abdelkrim Hasni
- Jennifer Dewitt
- Patrice Potvin
- L. Archer
- Jonathan Osborne
- Vasilia Christidou
In Social Psychology
- Jennifer Dewitt
- L. Archer
- Jonathan Osborne
- J. Lewis
- Abdelkrim Hasni
- J. Bennett
- Patrice Potvin
- Xiaoying Xu
Citations in the corpus
- Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research (2014, background): “Nevertheless, even if considerable efforts to synthesise research results have been made in the past 12 years (Awan et al., 2011; Blalock et al., 2008; Christidou, 2011; Foster, 2008; Krapp & Prenzel, 2011; Osborne et al., 2003; Rohaan, Taconis, & Jochems, 2010; Ruthven, 2011), none has given, to ou”
- Prospective primary teachers’ self-efficacy and emotions in science teaching (2013, background): “Some studies have focused on the importance of emotions and attitudes in science teaching (Barmby and Defty 2006; Bennett et al. 2001; Blalock et al. 2008; Marbá-Tallada and Márquez 2010; Vázquez and Manassero 2007; Zembylas 2002), with recognition of the need to consider the emotions of teachers…”
- HIGH ASPIRATIONS BUT LOW PROGRESSION: THE SCIENCE ASPIRATIONS–CAREERS PARADOX AMONGST MINORITY ETHNIC STUDENTS (2011, background): “Another focus of the critique of instruments used to measure attitudes towards science is the weakness of some of their psychometric properties (Blalock et al., 2008; Germann, 1988; Kind et al., 2007; Owen, Toepperwein, Marshall, Lichtenstein, Blalock, Liu, Pruski et al., 2008).”
- Would You Want to Talk to a Scientist at a Party? High school students’ attitudes to school science and to science (2009, background): “…plethora of existing instruments, many of which are limited in use to a single study, and failure to draw on ideas from psychological theory (e.g., Blalock et al., 2008; Gardiner, 1975; Munby, 1990; Ormerod & Duckworth, 1975; Osborne, Driver, & Simon, 1998; Osborne et al., 2003; Ramsden, 1998;…”
- Refinement of a Chemistry Attitude Measure for College Students. (2011, background): “More recently, Blalock developed a scoring rubric to rate the 66 instruments published in 150 peer-reviewed articles during 1935 ~ 2003 (Blalock et al., 2008).”
- Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: A meta-analytic study (2016, unknown): “This lack of clarity is re fl ected in the common practice that researchers will use their own newly developed instruments to assess attitudes, rather than a well-validated existing one (Blalock et al., 2008).”