General and specific measures in organizational behavior research: Considerations, examples, and recommendations for researchers

By T. Judge, J. Kammeyer-Mueller. 2012

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c13322d4d7f7716df95085f81593ddb8d25a9514

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Gil Luria
2. P. A. Freund
3. Yair Berson
4. F. Franke
5. Anne Herrmann
6. A. Hirschi
7. Joerg Felfe

In Social Psychology

1. Anne Herrmann
2. P. A. Freund
3. Gil Luria
4. Yair Berson
5. Alexander Pundt
6. F. Franke
7. A. Hirschi
8. Joerg Felfe

Citations in the corpus

• How do leadership motives affect informal and formal leadership emergence (2013, methodology): “We chose to include CSE in our model as a general personality trait to be examined in conjunction with a specific motive predicting outcomes (Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012).”
• The Career Engagement Scale (2014, background): “However, general measures also offer some distinct advantages (Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012): They are particularly useful (a) if the theory to be tested is more context-general (e.g., the effects of proactive career management on career development); (b) if the criterion of interest is general…”
• The Impact of Health-Oriented Leadership on Follower Health: Development and Test of a New Instrument Measuring Health-Promoting Leadership (2014, background): “Consequently, in order to shed light on these issues, it would seem to be useful to develop context-specific theories of leadership and corresponding measures (Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012).”
• Examining Follower Responses to Transformational Leadership from a Dynamic, Person–Environment Fit Perspective (2017, unknown): “If on the other hand, the criterion is unidimensional, a unidimensional predictor is likely to be more predictive ” (Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012: 169).”
• Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences (2016, unknown): “…Bledow & Frese, 2009; Bollen & Bauldry, 2011; Bollen & Lennox, 1991; Diamantopoulos & Papadopoulos, 2010; Diamantopoulos, Riefler, & Roth, 2008; Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012; Law & Wong, 1999; Law, Wong, & Mobley, 1998; MacKenzie et al., 2011; Nye, Brummel, & Drasgow, 2014; Williams,…”