Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis.

By Jessica Mesmer-Magnus, Leslie A. DeChurch. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009

1,274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8d676c38cb72f89044741c699378709b6607851

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Information Systems and Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Linking organizational identification and employee performance in teams: the moderating role of team-member exchange (2011, background): “Such an omission is surprising since more and more organizations have used work teams as the primary work units (Hollenbeck et al. 1995; Mesmer-Magnus and DeChurch 2009), and researchers have placed much value to study the quality of relationships among coworkers (e.g. Seers 1989; Sherony and Green…”
Voice Flows to and around Leaders (2013, background): “…employees share with their direct boss should be of particular value to the performance of that unit because it maximizes opportunities for timely learning and responsiveness by that leader (Floyd and Woolridge, 1992; Morrison and Milliken, 2000; Edmondson, 2003; Mesmer-Magnus and DeChurch, 2009).”
A Multilevel Model of Team Goal Orientation, Information Exchange, and Creativity (2013, methodology): “To explicate whether and how team goal orientation relates to creativity, we adopt the information exchange perspective (Mesmer-Magnus & DeChurch, 2009; Williams & O’Reilly, 1998).”
Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks (2011, background): “A meta-analysis found team members with more diverse information resources were less likely to share information with each other (Mesmer-Magnus & DeChurch, 2009).”
Women on corporate boards: key influencers or tokens? (2010, positive): “The meta-study of Mesmer-Magnus and DeChurch (2009) also confirmed that information sharing is higher in homogeneous than in heterogeneous groups.”
From causes to conditions in group research (2012, neutral): “…have been a sufficient number of encouraging findings recently to provide reason for hope that eventually we may be able to document the mediating role of group interaction process, at least in some circumstances (see, Littlepage, Schmidt, Whisler, & Frost,1995; Mesmer-Magnus & DeChurch, 2009).”
A meta‐analysis of positive humor in the workplace (2012, background): “Future research might explore the potential team member positive sense of humor contributes to other important teamwork processes, like affect management and effective information sharing (Marks et al., 2001; Mesmer-Magnus and DeChurch, 2009).”
Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving (2018, background): “…research on teams has typically focused on learning in groups (Slavin, 2017), group decision making (Gigone & Hastie, 1997; Hastie & Kameda, 2005; Mesmer-Magnus & DeChurch, 2009), or team training (Mathieu, Hollenbeck, van Knippenberg, & Ilgen, 2017), rather than group problem solving per se.”
Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis (2013, background): “Given the importance of accurate and credible feedback and information sharing for enhancing motivation, learning, and performance (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996; Mesmer-Magnus & DeChurch, 2009), developmental intent should be considered a critical element of a debrief.”
A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams (2011, neutral): “…sharing for nearly two decades (Baltes, Dickson, Sherman, Bauer, & LaGanke, 2002; Fjermestad, 2004; McLeod, 1992; Rains, 2005), theoretical shortcomings in defining virtuality and information sharing have impeded progress in this area (cf. Kirkman & Mathieu, 2005; Mesmer-Magnus & DeChurch, 2009).”