Optimal time lags in panel studies.

By Christian Dormann, Mark Griffin. Psychological methods, 2015

720 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afbedb9caff7ae0dee77cae81a6a8413a7f777b9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Health

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda (2018, background): “Thus, more longitudinal research is needed with theory-based research designs that provide a good rationale for times of measurement and time lags (e.g., Dormann & Griffin, 2015).”
Leadership Process Models: A Review and Synthesis (2017, background): “In doing so, we complement recent methodological efforts to find optimal time lags (Dormann & Griffin, 2015) with conceptual considerations to examine leadership processes.”
Consequences of knowledge hiding: The differential compensatory effects of guilt and shame (2018, methodology): “We choose two weeks as the optimal time lag because research has recently recommended the use of “shortitudinal” research designs (Dormann & Griffin, 2015), in ensure the quality of the data, quality-screen-outs were implemented to remove speeders (i.e., participants who answered questions…”
Psychosocial safety climate as a moderator of the moderators: Contextualizing JDR models and emotional demands effects (2018, background): “While the ‘correct time lag’ (Dormann & Griffin, 2015) is often debatable (Preacher, 2015), the effects are influenced by various factors including the stability of variables (Dormann & Griffin, 2015) and the types of strain (Ford et al., 2014).”
Latent burnout profiles: A new approach to understanding the burnout experience (2016, background): “The optimal time lag for evaluting stability in profiles may be much shorter than the usual one or wo year interval in most panel studies (Dormann & Griffin, 2015). n light of the correlations of the MBI subscales with one another nd with relevant constructs, a lag of two or three months may be ore…”
A multilevel study on servant leadership, job boredom and job crafting (2018, background): “10 JMP 33,1 D ow nl oa de d by U ni ve rs ite it U tr ec ht A t 0 5: 06 1 7 M ar ch 2 01 8 (P T ) In future studies, it would be valuable to use “shortitudinal designs” to find the optimal time lag to detect causal effects (Dormann and Griffin, 2015).”
Relations among math self-efficacy, interest, intentions, and achievement: a social cognitive perspective (2018, background): “In such work, optimal time lags between measurements are crucial (Dormann & Griffin, 2015), and should be informed by theory and/or appropriate pilot research.”
No Time Like the Present (2017, background): “In fact, it may be argued that most variables vary continuously over time and that they affect each other continuously over time (Deboeck & Preacher, 2016; Dorman & Griffin, 2015; Oravecz et al., 2011; Voelkle et al., 2012).”
The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies (2018, background): “Dormann and Griffin (2015) try to deduce optimal time lags statistically by focusing on variable stabilities.”
Psychosocial safety climate (PSC) and enacted PSC for workplace bullying and psychological health problem reduction (2017, background): “For instance it may have been too long to assess the maximal effect of bullying on psychological health (cf. Dormann & Griffin, 2015).”