The Self–Concept of Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta–Analysis of Comparisons across Different Placements
By Batya Elbaum. 2002
117 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f87b618e2f832b5b7dc24aa8ed8bc103bbd374a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- G. Lindsay
- E. Prince
- Julie A. Hadwin
- Christine Y. Tardif
- Friederike Zimmermann
- Cevriye Ergul
- Sonja Krämer
- Antonio Valle
In Education
- Julie A. Hadwin
- E. Prince
- G. Lindsay
- Antonio Valle
- José Carlos Núñez
- Christine Y. Tardif
- J. Gonzalez-pienda
- Friederike Zimmermann
In Safety Research
- Christine Y. Tardif
- Friederike Zimmermann
- Cevriye Ergul
- E. Prince
- Sonja Krämer
- Julie A. Hadwin
- G. Lindsay
- J. Wiener
Citations in the corpus
- The role of a sense of school belonging in understanding the effectiveness of inclusion of children with special educational needs (2013, methodology): “Self-esteem and self-concept have historically been variables of major interest because of the view held by proponents of inclusion that one of the benefits for pupils in more inclusive settings is more positive outcomes in these areas (Elbaum 2002).”
- Inclusive Education of Students With General Learning Difficulties: A Meta-Analysis (2021, methodology): “With regard to psychosocial outcomes, a particularly large number of studies have examined students’ self-concepts in more inclusive versus segregated educational settings (e.g., Cardona, 1997; Elbaum, 2002; Gorges et al., 2018; Sauer et al., 2007).”
- Social Comparison in the Classroom: A Review (2008, result): “In this context, however, we must note that a recent meta-analysis of Elbaum (2002) that compared the self-concept of AH students in different educational placements did not reveal an overall association between self-concept and educational placement.”
- Subgroups of Attributional Profiles in Students with Learning Difficulties and Their Relation to Self–Concept and Academic Goals (2005, background): “…although this author also acknowledged that “the finding of no reliable differences between groups of students with LD in different placements does not imply that there are no differences between any or all groups of students with LD and their peers without disabilities” (Elbaum, 2002, p. 224).”
- Social and Emotional Functioning of Children with Learning Disabilities: Does Special Education Placement Make a Difference? (2004, background): “Self-concept has historically been a variable of major interest because of the view held by proponents of inclusion that one of the benefits for students in more inclusive placements is a more positive self-concept (Elbaum, 2002).”
- Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming. (2007, methodology): “A meta-analysis of self-concept of students with learning disabilities derived from an analysis of 36 research reports allowing 65 different placement comparisons (Elbaum, 2002) provides more substantial evidence.”
- The Social-Emotional Side of Learning Disabilities: A Science-Based Presentation of the State of the Art (2004, background): “Several research studies have examined whether full inclusion has improved the self-perception and social status of students with LD. Based on meta-analyses, selfconcepts are not influenced by class placement (Chapman, 1988; Elbaum, 2002).”