For better or for worse? An analysis of how flexible working practices influence employees' perceptions of job quality

By Clare Kelliher, Deirdre Anderson. 2008

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This article is concerned with examining the relationship between flexible working practices and employee perceptions of job quality. In recent years a growing number of employers in the UK has introduced flexible working options for employees in response to increasing concerns over work–life balance and the desire to be seen as an ‘employer of choice’. At the same time there has been considerable policy debate among European Union (EU) members over job quality and the need to create not only more but better jobs. It might be expected that since flexible working affords a degree of choice to employees, it would impact positively on their perceptions of job quality. However, to date few studies have explicitly examined how flexible working can contribute to job quality. Where studies have examined outcomes relevant to aspects of job quality, the evidence is somewhat inconclusive. The research reported in this article was designed to explore how experiences of flexible working have influenced employees' perceptions of a range of job quality dimensions. The findings show a generally strong, positive relationship between flexible working and perceptions of job quality, but also that there are perceived costs to job quality, particularly in relation to longer term opportunities for development and progression, suggesting that the relationship is more complex.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d29f3b1c19d1e7d72d45423bbb53c956e3eb9b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

  1. M. Paškvan
  2. Geert van Hootegem
  3. Lily Chernyak‐Hai
  4. S. Spiegelaere
  5. Edna Rabenu
  6. Christian Korunka
  7. D. Wheatley
  8. Bettina Kubicek

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. M. Paškvan
  2. Geert van Hootegem
  3. Lily Chernyak‐Hai
  4. Meena Kumari
  5. S. Spiegelaere
  6. Edna Rabenu
  7. Christian Korunka
  8. D. Wheatley

Citations in the corpus