Collision Detection and Safe Reaction with the DLR-III Lightweight Manipulator Arm
By Alessandro De Luca, Alin Olimpiu Albu-Schäffer, Sami Haddadin, G. Hirzinger. 2006
782 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- Marco Hutter
- Jemin Hwangbo
- Sami Haddadin
- Alin Olimpiu Albu-Schäffer
- Sangbae Kim
- Gerardo Bledt
- G. Hirzinger
- Alessandro De Luca
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Sami Haddadin
- Alin Olimpiu Albu-Schäffer
- G. Hirzinger
- Alessandro De Luca
- Julie Arnold Shah
- Przemyslaw A. Lasota
- T. Fong
- Marco Hutter
Citations in the corpus
- Learning from Physical Human Corrections, One Feature at a Time (2018, background): “Traditionally, the human’s interactions are treated in one of three ways [9]: as disturbances to be rejected [5, 12, 23], as collisions to be detected and avoided [4], or as operator signals to be followed by switching into a compliant mode [8, 10, 14].”
- An atlas of physical human-robot interaction (2008, neutral): “In [55], a different strategy has been implemented on a lightweight robot arm, by determining a direction of safe post-impact motion for the robot from the same signal used for collision detection.”
- Contact Model Fusion for Event-Based Locomotion in Unstructured Terrains (2018, methodology): “disturbance observer [2] in discrete time.”
- Survey on human–robot collaboration in industrial settings: Safety, intuitive interfaces and applications (2018, methodology): “ROBOT PROGRAMMING Lead-through programming – standard used in industrial settings, together with OLP – [96]–[98]: usability assessment – [100]–[103]: improved with intuitive input devices (comparative overview in [13]) Off-line programming – standard used in industrial settings – refinements with le”
- Human–robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: a literature review of the decade 2008–2017 (2019, result): “They also compared with DLR LWR-III [47] and KUKA LWR4 + [52].”
- Collision detection and reaction: A contribution to safe physical Human-Robot Interaction (2008, methodology): “The collision detection mechanism proposed in [10], which provides a filtered version of the external collision torque τext, along with improvements concerning detection sensitivity and alternative detection schemes are presented and compared to each other.”
- Probabilistic foot contact estimation by fusing information from dynamics and differential/forward kinematics (2016, background): “This approach is in fact unfiltered version of Generalized Momentum (GM) based approaches presented in [5], [6].”
- Working Together: A Review on Safe Human-Robot Collaboration in Industrial Environments (2017, methodology): “On the basis of this idea, in the work reported five collision reaction strategies were formulated and implemented on a light robot [90].”
- A Survey of Methods for Safe Human-Robot Interaction (2017, methodology): “De Luca et al. (2009) developed a collision detection system for a prototype variable stiffness actuator that, similarly to the system developed by Geravand et al., does not require torque sensing. Their momentum-based system is combined with an active reaction strategy that simultaneously moves the”
- Probabilistic Contact Estimation and Impact Detection for State Estimation of Quadruped Robots (2017, background): “[15] proposed a collision detection and reaction method which identifies external forces acting on a link as first order filtered external torques acting on the manipulator’s joints.”
- Robot Collisions: A Survey on Detection, Isolation, and Identification (2017, methodology): “The monitoring method based on the generalized momentum observer introduced in [33], [34], and [44] was motivated by the desire of avoiding the inversion of the robot inertia matrix, decoupling the estimation result, and also eliminating the need of an estimate of joint accelerations.”
- Centroidal dynamics of a humanoid robot (2013, background): “The constraints on the velocities can be expressed in the form of a linear equation (Featherstone and Orin 2008),”
- Requirements for Safe Robots: Measurements, Analysis and New Insights (2009, methodology): “Further details are available in De Luca et al. (2006), Haddadin (2005), and Haddadin et al. (2008a).”