Requirements for Safe Robots: Measurements, Analysis and New Insights

By Sami Haddadin, Alin Olimpiu Albu-Schäffer, G. Hirzinger. Int. J. Robotics Res., 2009

460 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd61b34f94fa3bf0e1cffe32ea9be4ec05125154

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Citations in the corpus

Interaction Forces of Soft Fiber Reinforced Bending Actuators (2017, background): “2638468 quired for physically interacting with humans and handling unstructured or delicate objects [1], [2].”
Human-robot collaborative manipulation planning using early prediction of human motion (2013, background): “[7], [8], have led to the characterization of safety criteria.”
Collaborative manufacturing with physical human–robot interaction (2016, background): “In this context, it becomes indispensable to define safety and dependability metrics [16, 17, 18, 19].”
A Survey of Methods for Safe Human-Robot Interaction (2017, background): “Recent experiments have incorporated collisions between robots and instrumented crash-test dummies, both in simulation (Oberer and Schraft, 2007) and using actual physical hardware (Haddadin et al., 2007, 2009).”
Proprioceptive Actuator Design in the MIT Cheetah: Impact Mitigation and High-Bandwidth Physical Interaction for Dynamic Legged Robots (2017, background): “Through modal analysis of a simple prototype of a legged system, and dimensional analysis of motor performance across scale, Section III shows that the proprioceptive paradigm is uniquely situated to manage high-force, high-bandwidth contact interactions imperative to high-speed locomotion.”
Symbiotic human-robot collaborative assembly (2019, methodology): “Similarly, Haddadin et al. [69,71, 72] summarised a systematic evaluation of safety in HRI, covering various aspects of significant injury mechanisms.”
Human–robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: a literature review of the decade 2008–2017 (2019, background): “Haddadin et al. [48] made a systematic assessment of safety in HRI, covering various aspects of the most important injury mechanisms.”
Working Together: A Review on Safe Human-Robot Collaboration in Industrial Environments (2017, unknown): “in [23], [36], and [38].”
Safety in human-robot collaborative manufacturing environments: Metrics and control (2016, background): “Requirements for safe human-robot interaction were introduced for industrial robots in [1] and intensively investigated in [2]–[4].”
Human-Like Adaptation of Force and Impedance in Stable and Unstable Interactions (2011, background): “Furthermore, safety (in particular, in a human–robot interaction) [ 14 ]–[17] and energy minimization are required to keep mechanical impedance low, which is out of the scope of ILC.”
Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration (2017, unknown): “1 The problem of safety in human–robot interaction (HRI) and the related open issues have been extensively discussed in literature (Haddadin et al. 2009; De Santis et al. 2008; Alami et al. 2006).”
The KUKA-DLR Lightweight Robot arm - a new reference platform for robotics research and manufacturing (2010, background): “It was shown that none of the investigated robots could inflict life-threatening injuries on humans as a result of a blunt impact, provided that the person does not become trapped in the process [8].”