Effect Sizes in Single Case Research: How Large is Large?

By Richard I. Parker, Daniel F. Brossart, Kimberly J. Vannest, James R. Long, Roman Garcia De-Alba, Frank G. Baugh, J. Sullivan. 2005

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93f2310451f7eceb3045e2c220616421e33593df

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Sandra M. Chafouleas
2. Kimberly J. Vannest
3. Richard I. Parker
4. Benjamin G. Solomon
5. S. Klein
6. R. Horner
7. Daniel M. Maggin
8. John M. Hintze

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Kimberly J. Vannest
2. Richard I. Parker
3. Sandra M. Chafouleas
4. John L. Davis
5. Daniel M. Maggin
6. Benjamin G. Solomon
7. S. Klein
8. A. Briesch

In Social Psychology

1. Kimberly J. Vannest
2. Richard I. Parker
3. Sandra M. Chafouleas
4. R. Horner
5. Thomas Kratochwill
6. G. Sugai

Citations in the corpus

• An Application of the What Works Clearinghouse Standards for Evaluating Single-Subject Research (2013, methodology): “, 2011) but methods for balancing quantitative and visual assessments require additional conceptual work (Parker et al., 2005).”
• The Improvement Rate Difference for Single-Case Research (2009, methodology): “However, there are dozens of bona fide effect sizes, and their magnitudes can vary considerably for any given analysis (Cohen, 1988; Parker et al. 2005).”
• Synthesizing Single-Case Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practices: Some Brief Reflections (2012, methodology): “In addition, both use of nonparametric assessment of between-phase overlap (Parker et al. 2005), and application of regression modeling procedures (Beretvas and Chung 2008; Maggin et al.”
• An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs. (2009, methodology): “The literature search and digitizing procedure are described in more detail in previous articles (Parker et al., 2005; Parker & Brossart, 2003).”
• The Effect of Performance Feedback on Teachers' Treatment Integrity: A Meta-Analysis of the Single-Case Literature (2012, methodology): “The file-drawer statistic indicated that relatively few studies would be required to reduce the omnibus ES to Parker et al.’s (2005) first quartile cutoff for ALLISON-MT.”
• Effective Intervention for Behavior With a Daily Behavior Report Card: A Meta-Analysis (2010, methodology): “original study graphs (Parker et al., 2005).”
• A meta‐analysis of school‐wide positive behavior support: An exploratory study using single‐case synthesis (2012, methodology): “Because of issues related to autocorrelation and lack of power associated with simple mean difference approaches, a regression-based procedure was used to calculate effect sizes (Faith et al., 1996; Parker et al., 2005).”