An Application of the What Works Clearinghouse Standards for Evaluating Single-Subject Research

By Daniel M. Maggin, A. Briesch, Sandra M. Chafouleas. 2013

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Occupational Therapy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d859a47f9b378883ba0ade61a1ac969c03be4ce7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Seth A. King
2. Kimberly A. Davidson
3. C. Lemons
4. Lindsay M. Fallon
5. Daniel M. Maggin
6. Austin H. Johnson
7. Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Seth A. King
2. Kimberly A. Davidson
3. C. Lemons
4. Lindsay M. Fallon
5. Daniel M. Maggin
6. Austin H. Johnson
7. Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti

In Occupational Therapy

1. Seth A. King
2. Kimberly A. Davidson
3. C. Lemons

Citations in the corpus

• Math Interventions for Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder (2016, methodology): “Further clarification regarding these criteria may be necessary in order to prevent the unnecessary exclusion of evidence (Maggin et al., 2013).”
• Is Performance Feedback for Educators an Evidence-Based Practice? A Systematic Review and Evaluation Based on Single-Case Research (2015, background): “These types of rigorous syntheses (e.g., WWC guidelines, meta-analyses) are far more common for student interventions (e.g., Maggin et al., 2013).”