Safety climate and safety at work.

By Andrew Neal, Mark A. Griffin. 2004

396 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8cecf672e910fe94101dfb65bd730f21cf561168

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Citations in the corpus

Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. (2011, background): “In the context of workplace safety, our primary interest is the relationship of burnout and engagement to outcomes such as accidents and injuries, adverse events, and unsafe behavior (Neal & Griffin, 2004).”
The role of national culture in determining safety performance: Challenges for the global oil and gas industry (2009, background): “These perceptions indicate the true priority of safety as they are construed through the relative value of safety in relation to other organisational goals (Neal and Griffin, 2004; Zohar, 2002).”
Perceived violence climate: A new construct and its relationship to workplace physical violence and verbal aggression, and their potential consequences (2007, background): “The accident/injury literature has clearly shown an important role for leader actions that create a safety climate, that is, the emphasis and support given by organizational management to employee safety (e.g., Neal & Griffin, 2004; Zohar, 2003).”
The role of national culture and organizational climate in safety training effectiveness (2008, background): “…safety training interventions, our discussion turns to describing climate dimensions that are more directly associated with the organization level: management commitment to safety, the appropriateness of safety training interventions, and safety policies and procedures (see Neal & Griffin, 2004).”
Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. (2009, methodology): “Thus, we created a category for overall safety climate, which included studies reporting (a) an overall composite safety climate score or (b) at least two dimensions consistent with Neal and Griffin (2004), from which we calculated a composite data point.”
Toward a model for forming psychological safety climate in construction project management (2015, background): “In a similar way, leaders at all levels can play a key role in forming safety climate (Andriessen, 1978; Clarke and Ward, 2006; Hofmann and Morgeson, 2004; Neal and Griffin, 2004; Zohar and Tenne-Gazit, 2008), although some authors emphasize general leadership (Hofmann and Morgeson, 1999; La Porte, ”
A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. (2006, background): “Finally, although group safety climate might also be a predictor of accidents (Hofmann & Stetzer, 1996; Zohar, 2000), Neal and Griffin (2004) have argued that this relationship is mediated by safety behavior.”
Workplace safety (2016, methodology): “Causal sequence explained by job performance theory Based on Campbell et al.’s (1993) theory of job performance, Neal and Griffin (2004) theorized that the core individual determinants of safetyrelated behavior—like job performance—are individuals’ safety-related knowledge, skills, and motivation.”