LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY INSTRUCTION: CURRENT ISSUES AND RESEARCH
By A. U. Chamot. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2005
767 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c6c3c13073e0292d2aa10a830c053359df15d56
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Jeremy Cross
- E. Macaro
- Lawrence Jun Zhang
- Lars Stenius Stæhr
- Abdullah Tugrul Coskun
- Aijiao Wu
- Lynn Erler
- Paula M. Winke
In Language and Linguistics
- Jeremy Cross
- E. Macaro
- Lawrence Jun Zhang
- Lars Stenius Stæhr
- Larry Vandergrift
- Abdullah Tugrul Coskun
- Aijiao Wu
- Lynn Erler
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Jeremy Cross
- E. Macaro
- Lars Stenius Stæhr
- Abdullah Tugrul Coskun
- Aijiao Wu
- Lynn Erler
- Lawrence Jun Zhang
- Paula M. Winke
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer (2012, background): “Table 3 CALLA model (Chamot 2005; Chamot et al. 1999)”
- Learning Styles, Personality Types and Reading Comprehension Performance. (2012, background): “However, it is behind the scope of this study to define all the above learning style categories and their classifications (see Chamot, 2005 for recent classifications and related issues).”
- Raising the Achievement of Young-beginner Readers of French through Strategy Instruction (2008, methodology): “Rather, it is the effective use of combinations of context-specific and task-specific strategies that promote learning (Chamot 2005; Cohen 1998; Graham 1997; Macaro 2001, 2006; Vann and Abraham 1990); (f) that teachers would be better off spending time on teaching the language rather than wasting…”
- Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research (2007, background): “L2 listening success emerges from these studies (O’Malley & Chamot 1990; Goh 2002b; Vandergrift 2003a; Chamot 2005).”
- Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom (2017, unknown): “Research into student learning tactics and strategies has primarily relied on self-reports that are typically collected through questionnaires or think-aloud protocols (Bannert, Reimann, & Sonnenberg, 2013; Chamot, 2005; Hill & Hannafin, 1997).”
- Chinese senior high school EFL students’ metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use (2009, methodology): “What should be advocated is an incorporation of explicit strategy training into the usual reading instruction procedures (Chamot, 2005; O’Malley & Chamot, 1990; Zhang, 2008; see also Zhang, 2003, for a review of research on Chinese ELF learners, especially in relation to strategy-based instruction).”
- The Relationship Between Reading Self-efficacy Beliefs, Reading Strategy Use and Reading Comprehension Level of Iranian EFL Learners (2012, background): “Many studies (Chamot, 2005; Zhang, 2008) have attended to the importance of understanding the type of reading strategies used by good readers and the differences in reading strategy use between more and less effective readers.”
- VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE AND ADVANCED LISTENING COMPREHENSION IN ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE (2009, background): “…that less skilled listeners tend to approach the input through mental word-to-word translation (Vandergrift, 2003b ), whereas more skilled listeners appear to make greater use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies; that is, they draw on top-level cues (Chamot, 2005 ; Vandergrift, 2003a ).”
- An Investigation Into Second Language Aptitude for Advanced Chinese Language Learning (2013, background): “Researchers have speculated that strategies matter less for listening and speaking than for reading (Chamot, 2005; Farrell & Mallard, 2006) because in listening and speaking the importance of social and interactive skills overwhelms the effect of strategy use (Nakatani & Goh, 2007); reading, of cour”
- Language Learning Strategies Use by Saudi EFL Students: The Effect of Duration of English Language Study and Gender (2017, background): “In other words, LSs are procedures that facilitate learning tasks (Chamot, 2005).”
- Modeling cognitive and metacognitive strategies and their relationships to EFL reading test performance (2006, methodology): “Since none of the measurement methods is ideal (see Chamot, 2005; Wigglesworth, 2005, for discussion of elicitation techniques), we only do the best for what we can get.”
- Why Use Music in English Language Learning? A Survey of the Literature. (2013, background): “…with the learner strategy literature in general, there are a number of researchers who remain enthusiastic about the value of language learner strategies (Oxford, 1990; Naiman, Frohlich, Stern & Todesco, 1996; Chamot, 2005), suggesting that a more genuine interaction occurs (Lam & Wong, 2000).”
- The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Training on the Listening Performance of Beginner Students. (2010, background): “Similarly, Chamot (2005) points out that less successful language learners do not have the metacognitive knowledge needed to select appropriate strategies.”
- Metacognitive Strategy Use and Academic Reading Achievement : Insights from a Chinese Context (2013, methodology): “Many studies (Carrell, 1995; Wenden, 2001; Chamot, 2005) have addressed the positive effects of utilizing metacognitive strategies in the reading process.”