What makes a creative day? A diary study on the interplay between affect, job stressors, and job control.
By Carmen Binnewies, Sarah C. Wörnlein. 2011
214 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8842713a02d2fb54a36835a0e5b8f5677be2eabd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- H. Zacher
- Markus Baer
- Tamlin S. Conner
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Tamara Montag
- Carl P. Maertz Jr.
- Colin G. DeYoung
- Jing Zhou
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Tamlin S. Conner
- Paul J Silvia
- Neal M. Ashkanasy
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Colin G. DeYoung
- Carl P. Maertz Jr.
- Jing Zhou
- Michael Frese
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- H. Zacher
- Markus Baer
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Tamara Montag
- Carl P. Maertz Jr.
- I. Hoever
- Paul J Silvia
- Herman H. M. Tse
Citations in the corpus
- Transformational Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Promotion Focus and Creative Process Engagement (2014, background): “Creative Process Engagement The majority of creativity research focuses on the creativity outcome (Amabile et al. 2005; Binnewies and Wörnlein 2011; George and Zhou 2002).”
- Everyday creative activity as a path to flourishing (2018, background): “For example, higher PA has been found to precede creative workplace problem-solving (Amabile, Barsade, Mueller, & Staw, 2005; Binnewies & Wornlein, 2011; but see Bledow, Rosing, & Frese, 2013; for a more dynamic view of affect and creativity).”
- Individual ambidexterity: the duality of exploration and exploitation and its relationship with innovative performance (2017, methodology): “…variables have been shown to be related to creativity and innovation (e.g., Baer & Kaufman, 2008; Rietzschel, Zacher, & Stroebe, 2016), and are thus often used as control variables in (diary) studies on these topics (e.g., Binnewies & Wörnlein, 2011; Shalley, Gilson, & Blum, 2009).”
- A Critical Analysis of the Workplace Creativity Criterion Space (2012, background): “Some existing empirical work supports the CPBs → COE causal direction (e.g., Amabile et al., 2005; Binnewies & Wörnlein, 2011; Zhang & Bartol, 2010a).”
- A multilevel model of transformational leadership, affect, and creative process behavior in work teams (2015, methodology): “…process behavior in work teams, The Leadership Quarterly (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.05.005 Another problem is that the definitions of creativity used in past research are often inconsistent (Amabile et al., 2005; Binnewies & Wörnlein, 2011; Ohly & Fritz, 2010; To et al., 2012).”
- A Conservation of Resources Perspective on Negative Affect and Innovative Work Behaviour: the Role of Affect Activation and Mindfulness (2016, unknown): “…absence of a direct relationship between negative affect and creativity (e.g. Baas et al. 2008), and others showing that, under certain conditions, negative affects foster individual creativity (e.g. Binnewies and Wörnlein 2011; George and Zhou 2002, 2007; Kaufmann 2003; Kaufmann and Vosburg 1997).”
- A Dynamic Perspective on Affect and Creativity (2013, background): “An extensive body of research has shown that the presence of positive affect increases the likelihood that new and useful ideas will be developed (Baas et al., 2008; Binnewies & Wörnlein, 2011).”
- Having a creative day: understanding entrepreneurs’ daily idea generation through a recovery lens (2018, background): “Instead, it has been suggested that problem-solving pondering can involve positive work reflections (Binnewies et al., 2009; Hamesch et al., 2014; Zijlstra et al., 2014).”
- The role of weekly high‐activated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behavior: A multilevel and interactional model (2014, background): “…work behavior.2 Recent studies have shown that generation of novel ideas may vary within and between days (Amabile, Barsade, Mueller, & Staw, 2005; Binnewies & Woernlein, 2011); yet, to the best of our knowledge, little is still known about the time fluctuation associated with adopting novel…”
- Research on Workplace Creativity: A Review and Redirection (2014, background): “Binnewies & Wörnlein (2011) examined within-person changes in creativity as a function of daily affect, with job control as a moderator.”