Reconsidering the Organizational Identification Questionnaire

By Vernon D. Miller, Mike Allen, Mary K. Casey, John R. Johnson. 2000

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/881027e22a7c4703e61135c953c803f030242627

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Communication and Commitment in Organizations: A Social Identity Approach (2001, result): “One could be tempted to define this concept as in some respects similar to identification with the organization (Meyer & Allen, 1997; Miller et al., 2000; Mowday, Steers, & Porter, 1979) or vice versa (Ellemers et al.”
Social Identity and the Service-Profit Chain (2009, background): “Although some authors perceive a close relationship between commitment and identification (e.g., Miller et al. 2000), there is a consensus that identity and commitment are distinguishable in terms of their essential meaning.”
Organizational identification as a determinant of customer orientation in service organizations (2007, background): “Even though some authors view the constructs of OI and organizational commitment as being closely related (e.g., Miller et al. 2000 ), there is a consensus in recent literature that identification and commitment are distinguishable in terms of their essential meaning (Meyer et al. 2006).”
It Depends on Who You're Talking To…: Predictors and Outcomes of Situated Measures of Organizational Identification (2009, background): “This emphasis also helps to better separate identification from related constructs such as commitment (Sass & Canary, 1991) and to avoid criticisms of the OIQ in general (Miller et al., 2000).”
The relationship between organizational identification and organizational culture: Employee perceptions of culture and identification in a retail sales organization (2002, methodology): “Although not considered a primary purpose of this investigation, the replication and extension of Miller et al.'s (2000) analysis of the OIQ, raises some interesting questions concerning the affective commitment interpretation of the OIQ. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis yielded a 20-”
Organizational identification: Development and testing of a conceptually grounded measure (2007, background): “…commitment, the OIQ still suffers from the problem that the items do not link with how Cheney conceptualized the construct in the first place and from the fact that 28 EDWARDS AND PECCEI the scale itself ‘‘essentially provides a broad measure of commitment’’ (Miller et al., 2000, p. 648).”