Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning
By David A. Harrison, Kenneth H. Price, Joanne Gavin, A. Florey. 2002
1,618 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8702765f834dac7dcc64264fc847bb446b187e7c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- D. van Knippenberg
- Eric Kearney
- Bertolt Meyer
- Lindred L. Greer
- Astrid C. Homan
- Aparna Joshi
- Sara Harvey
- M. V. van Engen
In Social Psychology
- D. van Knippenberg
- John E. Mathieu
- Sharon K. Parker
- Steve W. J. Kozlowski
- Adam M. Grant
- M. Schippers
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Stephen E. Humphrey
In Sociology and Political Science
- D. van Knippenberg
- Lindred L. Greer
- Bertolt Meyer
- Astrid C. Homan
- Karen A. Jehn
- John E. Mathieu
- M. Schippers
- Sara Harvey
Citations in the corpus
- Is What You See, What You Get? (2008, background): “In exploring the relationship between heterogeneity and team outcomes, we focus on two general categories: surface-level and deep-level heterogeneity characteristics (Harrison et al., 2002; Harrison, Price, & Bell, 1998; Jackson, May, & Whitney, 1995).”
- Fitting In: The Effects of Relational Demography and Person-Culture Fit on Group Process and Performance (2007, background): “For example, several studies show that the initial negative effects of demographic heterogeneity may be attenuated after time as people learn about their similarity in underlying values (Chatman & Flynn, 2001; Harrison et al., 2002; Martins et al., 2003).”
- Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: is it important? (2005, background): “Differences in personality traits and thinking styles can also create diversity of cognitive attributes within a team (Harrison et al., 2002; Neuman et al., 1999; Triandis, 1995).”
- Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures (2017, background): “…extensively studied and argued that the effects of diversity may be different for different dimensions of diversity (e.g., surface- vs. deep-level; Harrison et al., 2002; Srikanth et al., in press) or types of diversity (e.g., gender, age; Bell et al., 2011) with inconclusive results (van Dijk et…”
- Social Category Salience Moderates the Effect of Diversity Faultlines on Information Elaboration (2011, background): “…stated for selecting these categories were either left unstated (van Dick et al., 2008), included because they “have a fairly long history of study” (Harrison et al., 2002, p. 1031), mentioned in pilot interviews with students from the sampled population (Harrison et al., 2002), or “salient to…”
- CEO Leadership Styles and the Implementation of Organizational Diversity Practices: Moderating Effects of Social Values and Age (2012, background): “The ‘‘black box’’ problem has also been raised as a significant limitation in prior work on organizational demography and workplace diversity (Harrison et al. 1998, 2002).”
- Transformational leadership and innovation in an R&D organization experiencing major change (2013, background): “Also, prior research suggests that time is critical to team dynamics (Arrow et al., 2004; Harrison et al., 2002).”
- What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. (2007, background): “Another approach sometimes used to operationalize diversity is to ask individuals how they perceive the diversity variable to be arrayed within their unit (Dooley, Fryxell, & Judge, 2000; Harrison et al., 1998; Harrison et al., 2002; Jehn et al., 1999; Miller, Burke, & Glick, 1998; Turban & Jones, 1”