Combined effects of the three commitment components on focal and discretionary behaviors: A test of Meyer and Herscovitch’s propositions☆

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The impact of internal marketing on commercial banks' market orientation (2011, result): “, 2008), but it is consistent with those published by (Shaw et al., 2003; Lagomarsino and Cardona, 2003; Chen and Francesco, 2003; Kondratuk et al., 2004; Wasti, 2005; Ackfeldt and Coote, 2005; Lee, 2006; Cohen, 2006; Gellatly et al., 2006; Hung and Lin, 2008; Bonaparte, 2008; Cichy et al., 2009), w”
The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation (2008, background): “Research (Allen and Meyer 1990, Glazer and Beehr 2005, Gellatly et al. 2006, Snape and Redman 2003) suggests a positive relationship between organizational commitment and continuance commitment.”
HRM practices and organizational commitment profiles (2008, methodology): “We are encouraged by the findings of recent studies that different component configurations can be distinguished in terms of employee behaviours (Gellatly et al. 2006; Sinclair, Tucker, Cullen and Wright 2005; Wasti 2005).”
Organizational commitment, organization-based self-esteem, emotional exhaustion and turnover: A conservation of resources perspective (2011, background): “Gellatly et al. (2006) found that the former tends to emerge when NC is associated with high levels of CC, while the latter emanates from a combination with high levels of AC.”