The Effect of Undergraduate Student Involvement on Critical Thinking: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature 1991-2000
By Alan Gellin. 2003
312 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8159b724bc73ccf7bb85fa8516799f6775890bfc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Vicki Trowler
- George D. Kuh
- Ernest T. Pascarella
- Paul R. Trowler
- Gary R. Pike
- R. Reason
- Chad N. Loes
- Alexander C. McCormick
Citations in the corpus
- Student engagement literature review (2010, background): “…between engagement and improvements in specific desirable outcomes, including: — general abilities and critical thinking (Endo & Harpel 1982; Gellin 2003; Kuh 2003; Kuh, Hu & Vesper 1997; Pascarella, Duby, Terenzini & Iverson 1983; Pascarella et al. 1996; Pike 1999, 2000; Pike & Killian…”
- What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement (2009, background): “, & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on college grades and persistence.”
- If and When Money Matters: The Relationships Among Educational Expenditures, Student Engagement and Students’ Learning Outcomes (2011, background): “Research has provided strong, consistent support for this premise, finding that engagement is positively related to learning outcomes ( Gellin 2003; Kuh et al. 2000; Pascarella et al. 1996; Pike and Kuh 2005; Pike et al. 2003).”
- An Assessment of Skills and Competencies Necessary for Entry-Level Student Affairs Work (2006, background): “Rather than focusing on “extracurricular activities,” a term that encompasses many areas of campus life, researchers need to direct their investigations to identify the impact of specific types and levels of involvement (Gellin, 2003).”
- Student Engagement: Developing a Conceptual Framework and Survey Instrument (2015, background): “, Lund Dean & Jolly, 2012; Magni, Paolino, Cappetta, & Proserpio, 2013) based on the significant relationship with learning outcomes (Gellin, 2003; Pike & Kuh, 2005; Pike, Smart, & Ethington, 2012).”
- College Residence and Academic Performance: Who Benefits From Living on Campus? (2010, background): “…student involvement, which in turn is a determinant of improved critical thinking ability, intellectual growth, persistence to graduation and satisfaction with college (Gellin, 2003; Pascarella, Bohr, Nora, Zusman, & Inman, 1993; Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991; Pike, 1991; Tinto, 1987; Velez, 1985).”
- The Impact of Faculty Teaching Practices on the Development of Students' Critical Thinking Skills (2012, background): “Although there is considerable debate over the definition and the elements of critical thinking, critical thinking has been listed as a top priority for undergraduate teaching and learning (Astin, 1993; Gellin, 2003; McMillan, 1987).”
- Effects of Active Learning on Enhancing Student Critical Thinking in an Undergraduate General Science Course (2013, unknown): “tasks (Gellin 2003; www.ctlt.wsu.edu; Andriessen 2006).”
- Using Critical Thinking Teaching Methods to Increase Student Success: An Action Research Project. (2017, background): “…thinking being identified as an important educational objective, strong evidence exists indicating that many college graduates lack critical thinking skills needed for success in the modern workplace (Ahuna et al., 2014; Gellin, 2003; Shim & Walczak, 2012; U.S. Department of Education, 2006).”
- Collaborative Learning and Critical Thinking: Testing the Link (2017, background): “Although various conceptualizations of critical thinking exist, in his metaanalysis on critical thinking, Gellin (2003) pointed out that this concept can be measured through specific assessment tools such as the WGCTA, CCTT, CCTST, or the CAAP critical-thinking module, for example.”
- Pedagogical Signals of Faculty Approachability: Factors Shaping Faculty–Student Interaction Outside the Classroom (2010, background): “Some of the more recent studies (e.g., Anaya & Cole, 2001; Cole, 2007; Gellin, 2003; Lundberg & Schreiner, 2004), have not only confirmed the findings of early studies, but also the conditional effects of such interaction based on sex (Sax, Bryant, & Harper, 2005; Wawrzynski & Sedlacek, 2003) and…”
- Student engagement evidence summary (2010, background): “…between engagement and improvements in specific desirable outcomes, including: — general abilities and critical thinking (Endo and Harpel, 1982; Gellin, 2003; Kuh, 2003; Kuh, Hu and Vesper, 1997; Pascarella et al., 1983; Pascarella et al., 1996; Pike, 1999, 2000; Pike and Killian, 2001;…”
- Effects of Involvement in Clubs and Organizations on the Psychosocial Development of First-Year and Senior College Students (2006, background): “Rather than focusing on “extracurricular activities,” a term that encompasses many areas of campus life, researchers need to direct their investigations to identify the impact of specific types and levels of involvement (Gellin, 2003).”
- Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter? (2006, unknown): “Research has provided consistent support for this assumption, indicating that engagement is positively related to test scores and self reports of student learning (Gellin, 2003; Kuh, Hu, & Vesper, 2000; Pascarella et al., 1996; Pike, 1999; Pike & Kuh, 2005; Pike, Kuh, & Gonyea, 2003).”
- The Convergent and Discriminant Validity of NSSE Scalelet Scores (2006, background): “Studies show that engagement is positively related to test scores and students’ reports of learning (Gellin, 2003; Kuh, Hu, & Vesper, 2000; Pascarella et al., 1996; Pike, 1995; Pike, Kuh, & Gonyea, 2003).”